From: Adrian Popescu <adriannnpopescu@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] 450 up stream test
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:35:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF3M4P2=2LWKgnMbGPMfMMAoRUQnjd-CPP-3ANzqXxYf=SbJBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw74TKyi4WMfDLrrVG9VbDYZ+RnGG+Dv=5sp38QitkfRpw@mail.gmail.com>
I've also observed higher packet delay on the second class with a
single stream with a rate limiter. Setting a rate limit of 50mbps
seems to be inducing latency as that stream goes up towards the limit.
I haven't checked if there were other competing streams which were
actually seeing that latency.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was finally able to induce "way" collisions and codel was not able
> to successfully control the depth of the queue in this test of 9
> copies of the 50 up test....
>
> root@nuc-client:~/git/iproute2-cake# tc -s qdisc show dev eth0
> qdisc cake 8003: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 920Mbit diffserv4 flows
> Sent 13826214606 bytes 10775480 pkt (dropped 187301, overlimits
> 7841897 requeues 79)
> backlog 1732937b 769p requeues 79
> Class 0 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
> rate 920Mbit 862500Kbit 690Mbit 230Mbit
> target 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms
> interval 105.0ms 105.0ms 105.0ms 105.0ms
> Pk delay 0us 22.0ms 0us 19us
> Av delay 0us 12.0ms 0us 1us
> Sp delay 0us 3.8ms 0us 1us
> pkts 305686 4248957 0 520011
> way inds 0 504555 0 0
> way miss 3 165303 0 7
> way cols 0 4656 0 0
> bytes 1040146583 11540379317 0 1730046460
> drops 38 187176 0 87
> marks 0 0 0 0
>
> We dont have a good way to plot a test this extreme, and offloads do
> hurt a lot. I turned off offloads to see what would happen:
>
> root@nuc-client:~/git/iproute2-cake# tc -s qdisc show dev eth0
> qdisc cake 8004: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 920Mbit diffserv4 flows
> Sent 3147074201 bytes 2948700 pkt (dropped 115035, overlimits 4207356
> requeues 417)
> backlog 1592366b 1159p requeues 417
> Class 0 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
> rate 920Mbit 862500Kbit 690Mbit 230Mbit
> target 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms
> interval 105.0ms 105.0ms 105.0ms 105.0ms
> Pk delay 0us 26.2ms 0us 9us
> Av delay 0us 12.2ms 0us 0us
> Sp delay 0us 4.7ms 0us 0us
> pkts 0 3064884 0 10
> way inds 0 456896 0 0
> way miss 0 106191 0 2
> way cols 0 1085 0 0
> bytes 0 3322825235 0 1186
> drops 0 115035 0 0
> marks 0 0 0 0
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-23 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 8:34 Dave Taht
2015-04-23 16:35 ` Adrian Popescu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAF3M4P2=2LWKgnMbGPMfMMAoRUQnjd-CPP-3ANzqXxYf=SbJBg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=adriannnpopescu@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox