From: Jose Blanquicet <blanquicet@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Cc: marco maniezzo <marco.maniezzo@gmail.com>
Subject: [Cake] [CAKE] Rate is much lower than expected - CPU load is higher than expected
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:10:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFC8iJKY+1iuiTHuo5OditK7RtpqZ=bbap+gzdEuM=gt5fiNZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi everyone,
We have an embedded system with limited CPU resources that acts as a
gateway to provide Internet access from LTE to a private USB-NCM
network (And also to a Wi-Fi private network but we will work on it
later). Our problem is that the bandwidth on LTE and USB link is
higher than what the system is able to handle thus it reaches 100% of
CPU load when we perform a simple speed test from a device on the
private network.
Therefore, we want to limit the bandwidth to avoid system getting
saturated in such use-case. To do so, we thought to use the CAKE on
the USB interface. For instance, we tried:
tc qdisc replace root dev eth0 cake bandwidth 20mbit ethernet
internet flowblind nonat besteffort nowash
It worked correctly and the maximum rate was limited but there are two
things that are worrying us:
1) The maximum rate reached after applying CAKE was in between 12Mbps
and 15Mbps which is quite lower than the 20Mbps we are configuring, we
were expecting around 18-19. Why? Is there something in the parameters
we are doing wrong? Please take into account that our goal is to limit
the rate but adding as little CPU load as possible.
2) The CPU load added by CAKE was not negligible for our system. In
fact, we compared the CPU load when limitation was done by CAKE and by
the device on the private network, e.g. curl tool with parameter
"--limit-rate". As a result, we found that the CPU load when using
CAKE was 30%. Is there any way to make it lighter with a different
configuration?
Thanks in advance for the support. Any suggestion is welcome.
Jose Blanquicet
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-22 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-22 13:10 Jose Blanquicet [this message]
2020-06-22 14:25 ` Y
2020-06-22 15:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-06-23 13:05 ` Jose Blanquicet
2020-06-23 14:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-06-23 15:21 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-06-23 16:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-06-23 16:25 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFC8iJKY+1iuiTHuo5OditK7RtpqZ=bbap+gzdEuM=gt5fiNZw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=blanquicet@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=marco.maniezzo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox