From: Neil Shepperd <nshepperd@gmail.com>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave@taht.net>, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] cake for net-next 4.8
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 21:17:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFnvbVMaft6_0hMWYtnWQp-0EBN2OmAvYmPoS=9pRrH+fY4csA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce538d93-1013-cc66-881e-15dcea5e606e@taht.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3860 bytes --]
Gmail spam team got back to me; they have apparently "fixed the problem",
which I guess means messages here should stop being marked as spam soon.
Because gmail's spam filters are top secret business, I couldn't tell you
anything else :)
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 at 17:10 Dave Täht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/30/16 1:37 PM, Neil Shepperd wrote:
> > Disabling ipv6 (at least in the mail server, in outgoing direction) is
> > probably the easiest option...
>
> It looks like the simplest thing I could do to allow inbound while
> stopping outbound ipv6 would be to:
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> smtp_bind_address6 = ::1
>
>
> > I see on most messages here DKIM-Signature headers apparently from
> > gmail: "v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com
> > <http://gmail.com>; s=20120113;". These signatures are failing because
> > of the added message footer. No sign of a DKIM-Signature
> > for lists.bufferbloat.net <http://lists.bufferbloat.net>. You'd need to
> > set that up in the list MTA.
>
> Honestly my "email-fu" has declined considerably in recent years.
> Despite the apparent simplicity of this idea, my brain just crashed
> multiple times on setting it up with postfix + mailman 2.
>
> And thank you for poking so deeply into this, I was A) really annoyed by
> the bloat-list-as-spam thing and B) clueless.
>
> > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 at 15:42 Dave Täht <dave@taht.net
> > <mailto:dave@taht.net>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/30/16 1:02 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > > Neil Shepperd <nshepperd@gmail.com <mailto:nshepperd@gmail.com>>
> > writes:
> > >
> > >> I think I have now accumulated enough spam/nonspam classified
> emails
> > >> to make a statistically signification observation: it seems like
> all
> > >> emails classified as spam from these lists were send from ipv6:
> > >>
> > >> SPF: PASS with IP 2600:3c03:0:0:f03c:91ff:fe61:86ce
> > >>
> > >> All emails from bufferbloat.net <http://bufferbloat.net> lists
> > are failing DKIM (because of the
> > >> mailing list footer breaking the DKIM signature) which might be
> worth
> > >> fixing, and failing DMARC because all mailing lists fails DMARC
> > >> (however google does not have a strict DMARC policy so that
> shouldn't
> > >> matter, I hope).
> > >>
> > >> By the way, it's not just you, either. I have emails from others
> on
> > >> these lists in my spam folder.
> > >>
> > >> The distinguishing factor seems to be whether the email was sent
> from
> > >> the lists.bufferbloat.net <http://lists.bufferbloat.net> ipv6
> > address. Unless this address
> > >> corresponds to some kind of tunnel broker possibly also used by
> > >> spammers, I can only assume this is some kind of bug (after all,
> it
> > >> was spf validated so the address shouldn't matter at that point?).
> > >
> > > Indeed, gmail requires extra measures for IPv6:
> > > https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126 (scroll down to
> > "Additional
> > > guidelines for IPv6").
> > >
> > > Fixing DKIM might be worthwhile :)
> >
> > But it passes the spf check?? And the reverse lookup is correct.
> >
> > How about I just disable ipv6?
> >
> > Have no idea why dkim doesn't work.
> >
> > >
> > > -Toke
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cake mailing list
> > > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cake mailing list
> > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6252 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-25 18:30 Dave Taht
2016-09-27 14:38 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-27 16:04 ` Dave Taht
2016-09-27 16:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-29 23:22 ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-30 8:02 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-09-30 13:08 ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-30 19:42 ` Dave Täht
2016-09-30 20:37 ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-30 21:10 ` Dave Täht
2016-10-03 21:17 ` Neil Shepperd [this message]
2016-10-04 6:33 ` Henning Rogge
2016-10-04 16:09 ` Dave Täht
2016-10-20 5:56 ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-27 17:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-27 18:18 ` Dave Taht
2016-09-27 18:56 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-27 19:29 ` Dave Taht
2016-09-27 19:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-28 23:26 ` Dave Taht
2016-09-28 23:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-29 20:43 ` Andrew Shewmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFnvbVMaft6_0hMWYtnWQp-0EBN2OmAvYmPoS=9pRrH+fY4csA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nshepperd@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox