Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noven Purnell-Webb <noven@liberant.com.au>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cake] Cake over satellite
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 01:25:31 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGgan9pgcMBZRhxAuHAQxw07Bi3E7tzQObcvMYMiqEb6ZJAYDw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]

I'm about to go on a mission to the outback, with one objective being to
tune a disappointing satellite link. Theoretically 6/1mbps, with RTTs
ranging from 700 - 1200ms. From the cake technical page
"The AQM layer has no configuration options. However, it is planned to add
simple tuning options for different prevailing RTTs that may be
significantly different from the Internet-scale 100ms currently assumed.
Satellite links tend to impose longer RTTs, and enclosed LANs tend to have
much shorter RTTs." Does this imply cake is not yet ready for use on
satellite links? Or merely that I'll get sub-optimal results but it's still
worth testing?
I see I could set the interval in sch_cake.c and recompile - is there any
reason why this would be a bad idea? Am I right in thinking with such
observed variation I'll get better results setting for the lower limit
(700) rather than the upper (1200)?
Any suggestions for a more sane target to set while I'm doing this?
Has anyone here already done testing on satellite links?

- Noven

-- 
- Noven Purnell-Webb
Creative Technology Consultant
+61 448 841 091
http://onecardme.com/NovenPWebb

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1551 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-19 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-19 14:55 Noven Purnell-Webb [this message]
2015-10-19 14:58 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-19 14:59 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2015-10-19 15:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-19 15:24   ` Dave Taht
2015-10-19 19:05     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-20 17:32       ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-10-21  1:26         ` Benjamin Cronce
2015-10-21  1:31           ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-23  7:58         ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-19 15:48   ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-10-19 19:58     ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGgan9pgcMBZRhxAuHAQxw07Bi3E7tzQObcvMYMiqEb6ZJAYDw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=noven@liberant.com.au \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox