Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Muscariello <luca.muscariello@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] lanman2018 cake talk ideas
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:25:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHx=1M7+_iHtOSBAB_Ffte9XoeEvudRrq3EsMLghbgD=9xGKug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7B5DJ-jaRF18z6sCLrB9ubCrb2bdnewTBG=ZHVp8FENA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2677 bytes --]

In my opinion, you should introduce the challenges faced to get to this
point a little bit more.
There has been an historically difficult insertion of packet scheduling in
the Internet.

FQ in the first place has suffered ostracism for a number of reasons, some
acceptable criticism,
some others just driven by ignorance.
You don't make that point at the beginning of the presentation and you
should, IMO.

Let me be a little dramatic for a second.
It's been an odyssey. Really, if we start counting from John Nagle (1985)
and
Ellen Hahne's Ph.D thesis at MIT supervised by Robert Gallager.
And take FQ_codel RFC as another milestone in 2018.

More than 30 years. That's an odyssey. Longer actually as Ulysses stayed
away from home only 20 years!
So cake is really sitting on giant's shoulders.
But the list is long, Jim Roberts, Scott Shenker, Luigi Rizzo and many many
others, sorry the list is too long.

Why so difficult? Was it worthy?
I think you should say that at the conference.
Gook luck!

Ellen L. Hahne:
Round robin scheduling for fair flow control in data communication networks.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA 1986



On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:44 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> I started at the lanman2018 talk (to be given next tuesday), this past
> weekend, for "piece of cake" ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07617 )
>
> Try as I might, finding a memorable narrative hook to fit into 20
> minutes eludes me. There's so much to cake! There's no room for me to
> break out a guitar or carry a case of water bottles into this preso.
>
> A principal complaint of the reviewers of the paper  was the lack of
> real world tests, so I snuck in a couple sides for that and am working
> on incorporating the graphs and other text from the paper.
>
> But ya know, it's always been a group effort and if anyone(s) here
> would like to contribute better slides, jokes, text, ideas, graphs,
> charts, or whatever, it would be helpful, because I can no longer see
> the forest after passing through it. I've oft wished we had the
> equivalent of a corp communications department 'cause my attempts at
> graphics generally suck.
>
> What does a ieee lanman2018 audience already grok, what needs to be
> explained?
>
> I will be periodically updating the currently very raw
>
> http://www.taht.net/~d/cake/ieee.odp
>
> as we go along. Please share your thoughts....
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5421 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-20  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-18 17:44 Dave Taht
2018-06-18 17:50 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2018-06-18 17:52 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2018-06-20  8:25 ` Luca Muscariello [this message]
2018-06-20 15:45 ` Pete Heist
2018-06-21  3:43   ` Dave Taht
2018-06-21  7:04     ` Pete Heist
2018-06-21  7:55       ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-06-21  9:42     ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-06-22  7:45 Felix Resch
2018-06-22  8:05 ` Pete Heist
2018-06-23  5:14   ` Dave Taht
2018-06-23  5:35     ` Dave Taht
2018-06-23  7:12       ` Jonathan Morton
2018-06-26  6:58     ` Dave Taht
2018-06-26  8:33       ` Pete Heist
2018-06-26 10:52         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-06-26 13:13           ` Dave Taht
2018-06-26  8:34       ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHx=1M7+_iHtOSBAB_Ffte9XoeEvudRrq3EsMLghbgD=9xGKug@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=luca.muscariello@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox