Re: [Cake] CAKE is going to be deployed on Alta Labs any day now!

[Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1767 bytes --]

Happy to see that! Thanks, guys.

Adding Jeff <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeff-hansen-6794021/>, Alta Labs
CTO - Darryl <https://x.com/DaryllSwer/status/1902486684476047544> has a
suggestion how to push this further: "Maybe they can add both FQ_CoDel and
CAKE with BQL support? How's hardware-offloading of FQ_CoDel looking on
these “prosumer” equipment these days? I haven't kept up over a year on
this topic."

All the best,

Frank

Frantisek (Frank) Borsik



https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik

Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714

iMessage, mobile: +420775230885

Skype: casioa5302ca

frantisek.borsik@gmail.com


On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 3:44 AM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > On 19 Mar, 2025, at 12:01 am, Frantisek Borsik via Cake <
> cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > Should be pushed through production in day or two and they will be
> talking about it on https://streamyard.com/watch/ubYm2AffWkYi this
> Wednesday,  March 19, at 1PM EST / 12PM CST / 11AM MST / 10AM PST
>
> I joined the stream, and was able to ask about the throughput they were
> getting with CAKE on their hardware.  This is just for the "Route 10"
> rather than their APs, and they reported getting about 2.5Gbps throughput
> with CAKE enabled. They do correctly note that the hardware-accelerated
> forwarding path is disabled for the interface where CAKE is turned on.
>
> Supporting 2.5Gbps is pretty good I think, and should be sufficient to
> handle all practical Internet subscriptions that are likely to require
> bufferbloat mitigation.  For comparison, on the same call they claimed
> about 800Mbps throughput for acting as a WireGuard tunnel endpoint.
>
>  - Jonathan Morton

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3456 bytes --]