fq_Codel is still useful if you need a traffic shaper with bandwidth
controls, like HFS. Maybe fq_Codel could be updated with "ways" like Cake,
to remove hash collisions.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> > On 19 Nov, 2015, at 11:17, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > A) Under what circumstances is cake a replacement for fq_codel?
>
> When shaping or Diffserv prioritisation is required, or when flow hash
> collisions are likely to be problematic.
>
> > B) When is fq_codel a better choice than cake?
>
> When none of the above apply, and a slight improvement in CPU and memory
> overhead is desirable.
>
>  - Jonathan Morton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>