fq_Codel is still useful if you need a traffic shaper with bandwidth controls, like HFS. Maybe fq_Codel could be updated with "ways" like Cake, to remove hash collisions.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19 Nov, 2015, at 11:17, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A) Under what circumstances is cake a replacement for fq_codel?

When shaping or Diffserv prioritisation is required, or when flow hash collisions are likely to be problematic.

> B) When is fq_codel a better choice than cake?

When none of the above apply, and a slight improvement in CPU and memory overhead is desirable.

- Jonathan Morton

_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake