Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Cong Xu <davidxu06@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] flow isolation with ipip
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 02:55:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE0qSNrbzUufzaup3sZyeKaN=R=JAfqREojbyK6pFAyzDw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGjowiTjDjOi8LuNLWhpXu10bmmCkBuBGUw3U_bzW2zGJarkUg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3948 bytes --]

Cake makes use of Linux' "packet dissecting" infrastructure.  If the latter
knows about the tunnelling protocol, Cake should naturally see the IP and
port numbers of the inner payload rather than the outer tunnel.

I don't know, however, precisely what tunnels are supported. At minimum,
don't ever expect encrypted tunnels to behave this way!

- Jonathan Morton

On 18 Jun 2017 21:13, "Cong Xu" <davidxu06@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I wonder if cake's flow isolation works with the ipip tunnel? I hope to
> guarantee the networking fair-share among containers/VMs in the same host.
> Thus, I used sfq/fq to associate with each tc class created in advance to
> provide both shaping and scheduling. The scripts roughly look like this
> (Assume 2 containers hosting iperf client run in the same host. One
> container sends 100 parallel streams via -P 100 to iperf server running in
> another host, the other one send 10 parallel streams with -P 10.):
>
> tc qdisc add dev $NIC root handle 1: htb default 2
> tc class add dev $NIC parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${NIC_RATE}mbit
> burst 1m cburst 1m
> tc class add dev $NIC parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate ${RATE1}mbit ceil
> ${NIC_RATE}mbit burst 1m cburst 1m
> tc class add dev $NIC parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate ${RATE2}mbit ceil
> ${NIC_RATE}mbit burst1m cburst 1m
> tc qdisc add dev $NIC parent 1:2 handle 2 sfq perturb 10
> tc qdisc add dev $NIC parent 1:3 handle 3 sfq perturb 10
> tc filter ad ...
>
> It works well, each container running iperf gets the almost same bandwidth
> regardless of the flows number. (Without the sfq, the container sending 100
> streams acchieves much higher bandwidth than the 10 streams guy.)
>
> -------------- simultaneous 2 unlimited (100 conns vs 10 conns)
> -------------
> job "big-unlimited-client" created
> job "small-unlimited-client" created
> -------------- unlimited server <-- unlimited client (100 conns)
> -------------
> [SUM]   0.00-50.01  sec  24.9 GBytes  4.22 Gbits/sec  16874
> sender
> [SUM]   0.00-50.01  sec  24.8 GBytes  4.21 Gbits/sec
> receiver
>
> -------------- unlimited server <-- unlimited client (10 conns)
> -------------
> [SUM]   0.00-50.00  sec  24.4 GBytes  4.19 Gbits/sec  13802
> sender
> [SUM]   0.00-50.00  sec  24.4 GBytes  4.19 Gbits/sec
> receiver
>
> However, if the ipip is enabled, sfq dose not work anymore.
>
> -------------- simultaneous 2 unlimited (100 conns vs 10 conns)
> -------------
> job "big-unlimited-client" created
> job "small-unlimited-client" created
> -------------- unlimited server <-- unlimited client (100 conns)
> -------------
> [SUM]   0.00-50.00  sec  27.2 GBytes  4.67 Gbits/sec  391278
> sender
> [SUM]   0.00-50.00  sec  27.1 GBytes  4.65 Gbits/sec
> receiver
>
> -------------- unlimited server <-- unlimited client (10 conns)
> -------------
> [SUM]   0.00-50.00  sec  6.85 GBytes  1.18 Gbits/sec  64153
> sender
> [SUM]   0.00-50.00  sec  6.82 GBytes  1.17 Gbits/sec
> receiver
>
> The reason behind is that the src/dst ip addresses using ipip tunnel are
> same for all flows which are the src/dst ip of the host NICs instead of
> veth ip of each container/VM, and there is no ports number for the outside
> header of ipip packet. I verified this by capturing the traffic on NIC and
> analyzing it with wireshark. The real src/dst ip of container/VM is visible
> on the tunnel device (e.g. tunl0). Theoretically, this issue can be solved
> if I set up tc class and sfq on tunl0 instead of host NIC. I tried it,
> unfortunately, it did not work either. fq does not work for the same
> reason, because both sfq and fq use the same flow classifier (src/dst ips
> and ports). So, I just wonder if cake works with ipip tunnel or not.
>
> I appreciate if you can provide any help based on your expertise. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Cong
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5720 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-16 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-12 19:13 Cong Xu
2017-08-16 23:55 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.1.1502985601.3893.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-08-17 17:38 ` Pete Heist
2017-08-17 19:27   ` Cong Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJq5cE0qSNrbzUufzaup3sZyeKaN=R=JAfqREojbyK6pFAyzDw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=davidxu06@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox