From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5CE93B29E for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:05:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id d4so20276411qtj.5 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:05:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BwzfLurQYAHmDAZxJcjoaSyc/Jf9kg8wzOwnqT1zcjU=; b=h1wKheECOVmyMMILrQ8T6+o2xPElH/uaNU+OWof/6/Cy+xHXD/VZmkxA9fpGTIoxGp h4lEBgDbKsik6AhFYu+d41vO1/3p4Zf3qdzdBrlSu+tAtdEkU8Yq4ouIeazjXghXPVKk l/+pdHw9Eokg5jYyCDvAw5ZoWtS/p84H5qJFSh6ZL3gVSVm+KnYmDT34hKK0siPoxNaB nUbi+Oo2JcLgloP0xCF3/2YBPTzdtSIbc0Hr8vBlFe0FsaYbM1OGOcD0BObMaLi1SPuD ip4ZtFmX3AFvjsNldaw3/+PqUjQ4seFjVl+hs86WCuDOW5u3lE1+6K63pu8TQGGte6Al +G+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BwzfLurQYAHmDAZxJcjoaSyc/Jf9kg8wzOwnqT1zcjU=; b=FdtOpqPJJQ1+er8/dV69asKEJQq96bxOw/PROJWKOi3F4OAKfJ8+tGtamXATKpbwPg lforxXu/QiHBF0VXufh5nnEck33/D4ai+Al3z741AiPbmNjZDkTyc2EJ9EaWH5fQG/is 8VI6lk1KbkfjSG60yMF963nTDAwx8E9XzKcrowXH41uNU7efj5cXeDVhQoIfK4onZ6Q2 h7Pi3r4ojroZiY5lX9T8/AVx6DUQHCbk0wIbT1mpjsn1Ebcbc9p2gP9KmBUZKaXOhuqB /ErDwGAZgsLjEtrpWTI6juAfR3g+pc/leOc/7x0KaofabcC/GoMejvRWnTCSDRF2YUEB 5ITw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJAhs9XjpqK7xGIHeXA7y4x/LXWSRdAJVA6HLlRu2PUoitI4/0Y fasoKSeJQIOhzsmjkb+lAgM735j19vrhGHweNO0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaK/itrthIpTGgFxTaEJsWE7stIO4HatR2mIFJGwFOQ+K9znS8/MHR0cUIupOz0rivIBBLJx6CZ0BEMytCmbq8= X-Received: by 10.55.161.78 with SMTP id k75mr32471181qke.158.1512673539365; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:05:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.102.179 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:05:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.102.179 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:05:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20171207173500.5771.41198.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> From: Jonathan Morton Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:05:38 +0200 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: Cake List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fd648f99f7d055fc4c01c" Subject: Re: [Cake] Fwd: [net-next PATCH 00/14] lockless qdisc series X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:05:39 -0000 --001a114fd648f99f7d055fc4c01c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Yeah, that's likely to help Cake on weak multicores; even if we can't actually make individual Cake instances concurrent, we should benefit from running ingress and egress in parallel with each other. And there's every chance we *can* make Cake run concurrently to some extent, even if it's just enqueue with dequeue. So you can then bring four cores to bear on simple bidirectional traffic. - Jonathan Morton --001a114fd648f99f7d055fc4c01c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah, that's likely to help Cake on weak multicores; eve= n if we can't actually make individual Cake instances concurrent, we sh= ould benefit from running ingress and egress in parallel with each other.

And there's every chance we *can* make Cake run concurre= ntly to some extent, even if it's just enqueue with dequeue.=C2=A0 So y= ou can then bring four cores to bear on simple bidirectional traffic.

- Jonathan Morton

--001a114fd648f99f7d055fc4c01c--