From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vn0-x231.google.com (mail-vn0-x231.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::231])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C256D201B71
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 29 May 2015 05:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vnbg62 with SMTP id g62so7990828vnb.8
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 29 May 2015 05:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=GiywdVJCf2lrgwgZSzB8oGOKxeOxC2EzqqKygd2/B+s=;
	b=ly1AG8MB34osZG/juuBoj/5/NuUfGuji0EclfljiHguqOLJu4mrOmCvGkL3DKP409/
	HHRbAOFsCU2tQHFroPgL+1CF5eWqRJ3l/Pw/SQAV5qM00Guw0346klqpAQZ6740jJIo/
	vvIEJWV78w+FgG1cCnTaPtvetgvP+CKCiXiK3PB+TNgeIMnhwOcvEfHJW3QjYCIvS1ZZ
	ElGfEGSBm7tOwVKQ00qIHKj2cmuRcPHImdwxp7kgRYvM+jvKl7DWdcyLuXLH08IW3QqO
	SE5pfQ3pmD026NiE2nT53JbMLAJ+DK6EVYBnjkgYb2DDTgUDwidCvMIbG/DI7p9wvluJ
	z90g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.251.107 with SMTP id zj11mr6931356vdc.96.1432903019163;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 05:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.12.167 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 05:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.12.167 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 05:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw60SFUP4BObBwCOy88nc5_jfykGK=45+09V+MMN0kNkyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7s=XYLuKwEeKaGzypAaX1+R5g=VNpJodO6dzEcV3rEvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<C2D26A05-0941-46AF-85DA-76E7DF195761@gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw60SFUP4BObBwCOy88nc5_jfykGK=45+09V+MMN0kNkyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:36:59 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE2+TN-U5E1F5jeoB1GLAXaFVtQRdDFJqnpA6WL5VeH-=w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134d45e747655051737bb19
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] cake byte limits too high by 10x
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:37:40 -0000

--001a1134d45e747655051737bb19
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

> being number of flow sensitive

I still don't entirely understand what you mean by this. It's already flow
number sensitive because it operates per flow - for N saturated flows it'll
initially send N signals per interval - and it gets more so every time I
find a way to improve the flow isolation.

- Jonathan Morton

--001a1134d45e747655051737bb19
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">&gt; being number of flow sensitive</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I still don&#39;t entirely understand what you mean by this.=
 It&#39;s already flow number sensitive because it operates per flow - for =
N saturated flows it&#39;ll initially send N signals per interval - and it =
gets more so every time I find a way to improve the flow isolation.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr"> - Jonathan Morton<br>
</p>

--001a1134d45e747655051737bb19--