From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B71E3BA8E
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  3 Oct 2017 23:22:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id i13so16803404qtc.11
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 20:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=Lvs6Bch/UxyBjPebLGrqXtZ9lkrzLI7GO+MSx/HmG/8=;
 b=GYsCSHS15xTMDe9Jq4zwuHFcIR0nq4D3XAKkZqCAoY43QpN1K07l9TWK62GliDgo+G
 RWtBnFF+bOsUVGqjE2TlBa6L4vXKRhKLcpcXZ4E2fw5VhnT1A6cdIuJHMBTVS6tVAkM0
 Jw2sYOImkRAQfBhOVPHSSQeZdH/wjwQrWQZl1yMlxS3x2lQHqOFWasU1PVn7eAYZN3Gh
 9bsp22JRpO3P1ISI7b9a06XZt/7FF5zX9g7ndIKvl2KEDGpj4rGIx0HHHNAxgJwFzV7/
 ETWjPIA8IVK1v4fU+uNTH46j+FptGTRESlAMP+Y/4DKeJoa0cZ4nucvuDLIODb78A1+V
 VViQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Lvs6Bch/UxyBjPebLGrqXtZ9lkrzLI7GO+MSx/HmG/8=;
 b=NsJ0cVOTs72nAiqzopAU44vHaaFVKChBu/giKzlRK1bEtkhN91eDYYIWF4riVmf+id
 ZO6RnLODkSrffTpoWVfuvmv7UDk1dcFCXksnOXU1lkQyUxralJyMfhXkT4UWhihT83uJ
 sLvNH5rXwGgE50Z47+q8fENzB9zvyGSjV9Q86mc2j9tdGSzsCJ9Rry2EMLYs7ZoSrPnt
 0/uI62mMF643r+dQhmvGsquFo5+TUdxu3piSvX2x+2mCrWLvXUFHfgsJPzy6d70V1vMs
 zz01IFjWBHkom8haCVh9UU5MFowZYmijJCE5oVwyZRP4NHk2+gbtF2f2FrsG9YcM4XD9
 4Ung==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXllryoG01BHh+K0RJXY0yLcWABnwmUVsuB4uKdquO+PBNwFf8n
 8WCwBhUtHGPQY3Ikc9XEYvnoL2V3dMjbGUrxOO4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDgp76ALP1QygecZoNzqYKQ6xC9/4VP4etEpmCjnDoqmUmANBpfr9DOIZmvaPv91GRBrghF8IUooN2F/dfq3hs=
X-Received: by 10.200.13.198 with SMTP id t6mr8977104qti.25.1507087326107;
 Tue, 03 Oct 2017 20:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.93.227 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 20:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.93.227 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 20:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <198aa7d2-246d-40c2-fd46-89979fa249d4@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw50hzBAuPX=YXaL9x-dEUk8bztNmQ1hAft2tnYbVU6TFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <e2ee8ccf-1e83-1e0d-a63b-2537500c4e11@gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw7Benz4k+hui3CJOBPTSWKq035utX0etn6tv4a20RVgcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJq5cE1LJJYE+BeoqiCa5rgUpKM1cfNX8RbRwh_Pxy_xmY6MEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw4eY8G7RuBAqH0Dxzryy4SXwNnf6a+ecBgyuTjLD5a60A@mail.gmail.com>
 <198aa7d2-246d-40c2-fd46-89979fa249d4@gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 06:22:05 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE3hVX+uifcwZuHT9+hDybjqCxEkPnCr=vyrUwSBUwOrWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Noah Causin <n0manletter@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e08229880b7dda1055ab01ce3"
Subject: Re: [Cake] best way at getting at tcp ack data?
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 03:22:06 -0000

--089e08229880b7dda1055ab01ce3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

No, because acks are cumulative.  Dropping an ack doesn't normally trigger
any retransmissions, and is actually difficult to detect reliably at the
sender.

- Jonathan Morton

--089e08229880b7dda1055ab01ce3
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">No, because acks are cumulative.=C2=A0 Dropping an ack doesn=
&#39;t normally trigger any retransmissions, and is actually difficult to d=
etect reliably at the sender.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr"> - Jonathan Morton<br>
</p>

--089e08229880b7dda1055ab01ce3--