From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <agarrood25@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yb0-x236.google.com (mail-yb0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::236])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EE53B260
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:17:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f97so46600645ybi.1
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 07:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=FldL6AG+t3E6gn/hpNe/+S53RS0D0DvDwWtxgTf1LSw=;
 b=VhU3rexLlm68B0b2aeT4zd70/c/liAIWvn2ZC/C9ZJQq/0CyaGQq/HGQ+1AUHDc7yH
 Lkhdl4JXovmFYfJ4RADNk7dkLSFw+phVk2NkbAdZOSmff3E2jzZdWd5nYHYSKey44dnT
 xB1N5cKoYBXk1lScKWbn2Bir/Vsk4n5B72Bzna0SfU+kh8vISYGTOjOzpyUtxt6kMtj4
 pZjnH5cJnc6v5yilFImWDXs/oQzmC4GRLGhjCBnnrAtnwVo6+CtfsZKUBxrUw5crnlM4
 kw6jSzYFIzBDH8m9169bCdEOEGZ1ruUoMoy8SIrclNLCoNoXos7TUqs8dImaViBkfY7D
 ocyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=FldL6AG+t3E6gn/hpNe/+S53RS0D0DvDwWtxgTf1LSw=;
 b=UDFmQ66z89peEKzWOLQwunLLh183WxWuttRAwqu98DbNBl8G4XlN+Das5OBH/DZ1pz
 1P8HDaN4F5FCb8zrOYbgIJjSV/hAlJyRwLU8HGDjvc3l2Ci0tOt5My2w+b7Ov62cSF/1
 /PTVr70J71a52xdrJFs0cMOcoLD+h6SbeauOtaCNgqhpW9bfLB94UjJlv+4cgnxqPfLB
 RON0Cata9wIansiG7rZwAlfFzt5EDEFSabNNRt1zhMZvNv3V8Pe0+BmFxKanunBh/pCR
 Y523f1Poz6f8mmHAP/xQFCWm22THKDy1IdZZGWdQt/Bm3mQ0Sbf9Hhse+fUEXMbC4P7w
 QlYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdm39b/jcSG+jbNfgjOgdosWUlYcKBEL9LVgpdgUPVsdj/tMCrAaMUO5NXVSUu2C1jUwrdh+zKjiH9HWQ==
X-Received: by 10.37.164.162 with SMTP id g31mr16331312ybi.140.1477750638429; 
 Sat, 29 Oct 2016 07:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.174.156 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 07:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex Garrood <agarrood25@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:17:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CALMNQQoJjoiNByFF7PGj2Rju7Peokx+jH2GsprWuDufvMB-drQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Cake] LEDE project - piece_of_cake or layer_cake QOS script
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:17:19 -0000

Hi all, I've just flashed a LEDE image to my home router in order to
make use of Cake.

I noticed there are two different Queue setup scripts in luci-app-sqm:

layer_cake.qos:
This uses the cake qdisc as a replacement for htb as shaper and
fq_codel as leaf qdisc. This exercises cake's diffserv profile(s) as
different "layers" of priority. This script requires that cake is
selected as qdisc.

piece_of_cake.qos:
This just uses the cake qdisc as a replacement for htb as shaper and
fq_codel as leaf qdisc. It just does not come any simpler than this,
in other words it truely is a "piece of cake". This script requires
that cake is selected as qdisc.


Which would you recommend for a home network type setup and are there
any particular advantages or disadvantages to either option?

Many thanks.