From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <luis@bitamins.net>
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A713B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu,  6 Apr 2017 09:51:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f84so29818321ioj.0
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=bitamins-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=Q0nqGwsS8LRPJDEqbXybtGl2GTB6pfk/WN8w7U4XVu8=;
 b=P/yUJ114JEj5briQq6uBCFpbvN80GV9cVz3jUYgh//J1h6XUr9WF8bRD5ipsoeI9mf
 nlzDlsVmsB43jluJXdlJ6JWHugiG8fLSLfoJlst5RfGWTlErbow0wu91izjKsqy47BY5
 goadZiq8lwV1Tj9sf95ZIZC5BYperzNHPeJS9xJeFBqEJYmIeK0MSK2GrpBcumAHDyw/
 7yMVrN/gi7pAqpRLvQi8RfRJsvLHbsS6qB3E5ImebELWqrSKVc54EAtGst9W+iqhFK7o
 iZP+CPGucUjjkY2LEq0QgH9B07Dql73mWMz2l8TqVe8IAVtQamSLdSYApkbEmz8GUEIV
 FViw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=Q0nqGwsS8LRPJDEqbXybtGl2GTB6pfk/WN8w7U4XVu8=;
 b=LjZO6Dvwh3iHhfLljqXL7C4KnF39ywr4V2j57ghvB373ET+oAEr/d4OczC8aU0oHxj
 t+KBDsX6CfZnX3wpHq6moufm0/yfGNOi60WPlwQu9yRAPKXr+9nhWKsmMSmRiI1c0vkz
 9l+ek8lcbSO7mchAyVEiGJsNMJY0akiVPOGv9yvQ26GSSPpWm+PsGWx0CM3rCtZFwEk3
 nKOhcw/k9Cww16dfCAkTUa0w/nduKU+C9Ac1DFKq+KO6E3P5A5ZEh09Yo7ld+lCMexJp
 JaGqEnGOw90XeWiArsLHaQJpcupU94BV7kWXp6tyuqY42AFrmR3FK8LDCVrF1hbouQaZ
 OWCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2Fag1ZIRJGECO5V6h2FiVUvaIW1yRY4VJwmyFyj9KFpKsCCWAJkfZUne2Y1MU9qKVwMMZO4tFQWHcWhQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.59.22 with SMTP id i22mr33128663ioa.177.1491486715603;
 Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.117.155 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 06:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [190.53.143.4]
From: "Luis E. Garcia" <luis@bitamins.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:51:55 -0600
Message-ID: <CALnBQ5=7fybwwKNqZMnQJAScFHeygmp6D7LcU2=JMpG1LrgLeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0960e6df2bb1054c7fcf2c
Subject: [Cake] A quick question about FQ_CoDel vs Cake
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:51:56 -0000

--94eb2c0960e6df2bb1054c7fcf2c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi everyone,
I've been doing some testing of Cake on LEDE (WD MyNet 750) and on EdgeOS
(Ubiquity ERPoe). One big question that I have is why does Cake have a
higher/better average throughput than FQ_CoDel? The graph seems a bit
smoother through the speed test.

The test are against a 10down/2up Mbps connection from a local provider.

Luis

--94eb2c0960e6df2bb1054c7fcf2c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi everyone,<div>I&#39;ve been doing some testing of Cake =
on LEDE (WD MyNet 750) and on EdgeOS (Ubiquity ERPoe). One big question tha=
t I have is why does Cake have a higher/better average throughput than FQ_C=
oDel? The graph seems a bit smoother through the speed test.</div><div><br>=
</div><div>The test are against a 10down/2up Mbps connection from a local p=
rovider.</div><div><br></div><div>Luis</div></div>

--94eb2c0960e6df2bb1054c7fcf2c--