From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 123D93B2A0 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 12:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id b65so44046126oia.1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bitamins-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=EJUtI9MA63kKrEWFuAmzgEQqOEJIitIH+eYtnz4gx+w=; b=q2SCGrbIOfsFOrjHO7ksS8vnkrc+A4NkSVCWU0/xagiiDHq73jaICSQH2ImQNLNvFS V2kfgZuc9HR88XZg949CwbrUakX9YPTykUgGkRn5bwDQ8TozQXi0Y+FmeA8dOVZ+SBhf r9dXX0mGzo3kg8IEe3fd+BRX8OgbNhCANBpzt5cZPyDhjd5NhupR0DI6SO9Ug4asfkbF eDwemD+XtgFH+yZ9W5aqQRVtf9lhl8TQYNMBPVy0Xcx1FEffngoj2MvUO51gNSmR0OM6 zTWW+yF5BiaxgKi2f7wgyko5tOtIT9aJu4jsPWg3eUJHr2ou6egK7Q/VGL4h46G+hSvi mqRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=EJUtI9MA63kKrEWFuAmzgEQqOEJIitIH+eYtnz4gx+w=; b=aV/ScQOSSKHW3gUV84FfEVWkUXyX7ukvAmYhfUCWl2Tv8wI1m6OxQq4IyNzCF0WMyc 1Am2Vd08KJAtGo/q3YXPjO3MJ0j6/qaBXD2saYtobnKm2Bp5p1Y99jLQsc9/S0HHRYbl K/R+NwckbKPQY/RnCxtc7ufthRn5id+vDo26Z23PKOzPF2J9djg4nePfrsm2fERSAR+4 ldXjQQ1/8wmJrkLDk+QysfTUxIPOuIBCj9f47SIk6thLWUSLWIJGWvWXEcLLYwrvhli5 TSFSUOmoJF50jl0Kb3p4/LHx3bWd61ySh5mUrQqWgNJH2KIeb/bfbR1USZapDquA86+z iKPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX91ZqZxNMMjb/Gw+bftKKcMlrwkSO0UUcxiyXMZP8RXZzEpBFq75QDhALiI+IHLjYtxIFJ7CpUHV91FA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.43.85 with SMTP id f21mr2810722otd.116.1463763346518; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.17.7 with HTTP; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [206.108.31.35] In-Reply-To: <8AB0D25D-C1CA-45F1-889E-2F73CF8C44F7@gmail.com> References: <22371476-B45C-4E81-93C0-D39A67639EA0@gmx.de> <857AEE56-E7DB-4981-B32E-82473F877139@gmail.com> <8AB0D25D-C1CA-45F1-889E-2F73CF8C44F7@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 10:55:46 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Luis E. Garcia" To: Jonathan Morton Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d0c6c4e3387053348f665 Subject: Re: [Cake] Proposing COBALT X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 16:55:47 -0000 --001a113d0c6c4e3387053348f665 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That sounds nice. I have a few spare x86 mini routers that would be useful as test beds. * Yeah, I meant LEDE - I'm still adjusting to the new vocabulary. Luis On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote: > > > On 20 May, 2016, at 19:37, Luis E. Garcia wrote: > > > > I think this would be a great idea to implement and test. > > Can COBALT's behavior be easily implemented to test it using the OpenWR= T > or LEVE ? > > I assume you mean LEDE. > > Yes, the BLUE algorithm is very simple (and is already in Linux, if you > want to see how it behaves independently). It=E2=80=99s merely a case of= modifying > a fork of sch_codel and/or sch_fq_codel and/or sch_cake to run it in > parallel with the Codel algorithm. > > I=E2=80=99ll probably get around to it once I=E2=80=99ve got some current= Cake changes out > of the way. > > - Jonathan Morton > > --001a113d0c6c4e3387053348f665 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That sounds nice.
I have a few spare x86 mini routers = that would be useful as test beds.

* Yeah, I meant= LEDE - I'm still adjusting to the new vocabulary.

=
Luis

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Morton <= ;chromatix99@gma= il.com> wrote:

> On 20 May, 2016, at 19:37, Luis E. Garcia <luis@bitamins.net> wrote:
>
> I think this would be a great idea to implement and test.
> Can COBALT's behavior be easily implemented to test it using the O= penWRT or LEVE ?

I assume you mean LEDE.

Yes, the BLUE algorithm is very simple (and is already in Linux, if you wan= t to see how it behaves independently).=C2=A0 It=E2=80=99s merely a case of= modifying a fork of sch_codel and/or sch_fq_codel and/or sch_cake to run i= t in parallel with the Codel algorithm.

I=E2=80=99ll probably get around to it once I=E2=80=99ve got some current C= ake changes out of the way.

=C2=A0- Jonathan Morton


--001a113d0c6c4e3387053348f665--