From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com (mail-ua0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A553B29E for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 22:27:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id j17so35679286uag.3 for ; Mon, 08 May 2017 19:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mD8RZFGgBV+sc8jWwUNfgLFWh34gAJ24ujWcPr+sKMU=; b=YiJ6xmqxCFAbpfk/5P4Cy6mab+oSy3MAPc2CRJBpiInWD0gfJaAiy3feJMGoT0ulSW McnENz5qE1xz+bt/SlcOEm6YA2Jdiyg7z1bae6EIFz9+/w5IGFW7GnNqG7sB4M7Hicev a/iq7SWlxwO/r483WzOi1mOQKaTSB2HH00RsQvTSQbh280JPJz1kDDO+YEWrbW/Ghms9 IC0OAq5/apgMJJIIahOwYm9svjldd+XwI1Jvb16pFiX2cGOye7iuf3uFRs8O0jz3kbCN PCj6w5tqEXCOo9WIO+4e6meHGJvEXVaPo5sjaiLpOzk5DBNhjyIS1pRZ3bJ1+Qwoxwhr 5ziQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mD8RZFGgBV+sc8jWwUNfgLFWh34gAJ24ujWcPr+sKMU=; b=JNJ4TLSJh4I1m6ehGTvjT0U2nJWBqyRmO1EiiAhkqn6no1ZTay0AAqt/pqX9fjvFez jxLtGvGL7Ugm8GcO1C/j2VFptiWg6wIDxkbT/rtF37RBc+R6Ocp1QvCZfDUN0dw71KnN Gl5Q01ARM/T97mIsTA2MoajNqBtyx30SqZT70SKTiN5SaWfKee9Z30iwGqv27zqMe6L/ Jn+YTEDYI1HHGqkvVR/MTkNPj0bY7daCV9bkKQLs9ZYY7uGQOgJaFIJs+ocmtT0oEUxG AixCPEs7r/2ltMSgGw4ZatR5zmz3sJSplC1oNMiaA43RuzAYtnYX5rGjqleZHJIlP93F kvMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/65w8lqy4JVSowAZgpxBwPFwjY7UO1B3oZI3pDGbG+ZCKmG8x6l t63+68E3J3ZWW062QPK3CpHj/DscnA== X-Received: by 10.176.80.100 with SMTP id z33mr22439774uaz.139.1494296828642; Mon, 08 May 2017 19:27:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.89.194 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2017 19:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.89.194 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2017 19:27:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jon Pike Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 19:27:07 -0700 Message-ID: To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c192582a90986054f0e173a Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake] Current status and recommendations for APU2C*/ArcherC7 and ath10k platforms? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 02:27:09 -0000 --94eb2c192582a90986054f0e173a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Been away for a while... and never got a response to the question about which wifI routers have the new wifi fast stuff working on their ath10k. Thought I'd ask again if the C7 would ever get it, or which other routers currently do. On Apr 20, 2017 3:05 PM, "Jon Pike" wrote: * >1. What's the status of make >wifi fast on the ath10k now, or >did it *>* make it there yet? * >Well, the queue rework is in >there, but only enabled for >certain >hardware. Not for the Archer, >though... Bummer... Is there a handy list of which devices are MWFF functional on ath9k and ath= 10k? On Apr 20, 2017 2:13 PM, "Jon Pike" wrote: > >The 17.01 LEDE release is great for >both the C7 and the WNDR3800, and > > has all the WiFi-related fixes (bufferbloat fixes and airtime fairness) > included. You'll probably need something beefier for a main gateway at > those speeds, though. Not sure about the APU2; think it is supported in > >LEDE as well? > > Just a note, I have a C7, and it might just be able to get by at your spe= eds. Actually, have a 300/30mbit cable connection, so I've done a lot of ex= perimenting to see how much of that it can handle. The limit seems to be ab= out 120-140 (set) with measured speed being 100-125mbit, with Cake running,= before my C7 starts hitting 0% idle. Now, only ingress is that fast, with= the egress much slower, not sure if it would he worse case with both abou= t as fast. No SQM, or SQM on the 30mbit egress only, and it's good to >340= mbit. > > Thought this might be a good place to ask a question or two abt the wifi = fast stuff... while Toke's listening. > > 1. What's the status of make wifi fast on the ath10k now, or did it make = it there yet? > > 2. Is there any benefit or reason to use (or not) the optional Caldera at= h10k driver vs the standard one? (Possibly no MWFF connection) > > TNX... > > --94eb2c192582a90986054f0e173a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Been away for a while... =C2=A0and never got a respo= nse to the question about which wifI routers have the new wifi fast stuff w= orking on their ath10k. =C2=A0

Thought I'd ask again if the C7 would ever get it, or which other rout= ers currently do.


On Apr 20, 2017 3:05 PM, "Jon Pike" <jonpike54@gmail.com> wrote:
 >1. What's the status of =
make >wifi fast on the ath10k now, or >did it
> make it there yet?


>Well, the queue rework is in >there, but only enabled for >certai=
n
>hardware. Not for the Archer, >though...
Bummer...   
I=
s there a handy list of which devices are MWFF functional on ath9k and ath1=
0k?

On Apr 20, 2017 2:13 PM, "Jon Pike" <= jonpike54@gmail.co= m> wrote:
>The 17.01 LEDE rele= ase is great for >both the C7 and the WNDR3800, and
has all the WiFi-related fixes (bufferbloat fixes and=
 airtime fairness)
included. You'll probably need something beefier for a main gateway at
those speeds, though. Not sure about the APU2; think it is supported in
>LEDE as well?
Just a note, I h=
ave a C7, and it might just be able to get by at your speeds. Actually, hav=
e a 300/30mbit cable connection, so I've done a lot of experimenting to=
 see how much of that it can handle. The limit seems to be about 120-140 (s=
et) with measured speed being 100-125mbit, with Cake running, before my C7 =
starts hitting 0% idle.  Now, only ingress is that fast, with the egress mu=
ch slower, not sure if it would he  worse case with both about as fast.  No=
 SQM, or SQM on the 30mbit egress only, and it's good to >340mbit.
Thought this might be a good place =
to ask a question or two abt the wifi fast stuff... while Toke's listen=
ing.
1. What's the status of m=
ake wifi fast on the ath10k now, or did it make it there yet?
2. Is there any benefit or reason to use (or no=
t) the optional Caldera ath10k driver vs the standard one? (Possibly no MWF=
F connection)
TNX...

--94eb2c192582a90986054f0e173a--