From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua0-x22c.google.com (mail-ua0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A013B29E for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:05:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ua0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f10so65760958uaa.2 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KcO9+Q8CnckpFo6UK6fL4XGV3NFJp7uiiGb2pnCSRYM=; b=gpvlZ7+lqZbxtTnjtJmBM7iCAngTLZbwUQmVWSyg0UatcaTbnntzO3+gnKfqOEjmxr FG3etHbmFpbLJ3nScgn9uM4xlo/x0SF9wRjcyxUldKQgc3f3PZ4o6N/LiHdcFQcLV5jf bp68TX3BcepjDyKYf+GQftrsMAyVSYKaJo9y+QeOtRO+ROt1au/hUlR4qGAzBxNhS0Ys uk1V40Are4GncxG9Box1P5eUB6pyYcGu9IrkIGrp6mW3X46jfMa2jNKxWfXmtk55R5Uj cjG7J6GJ2I8I4okv+4XjmaA0BW/AIUfctL/3gNQdjc3sqjn3R2GkSgPj+qcqXcEZ2al1 lwEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KcO9+Q8CnckpFo6UK6fL4XGV3NFJp7uiiGb2pnCSRYM=; b=lGdTGnX2PDMQGeRq3uV8AtJjIO7XcEJ/+kQ/ZWlzayseS9XS7ibVy7TI1iJFOKziuB hJR0Y2s9NUBK4Ppq+WAEqt7tqbZeuBomrVkJDZWCJ20MLy71FeDcKd/lMdAuQok1V3lE nefc0GACXrzM0tT9YgVqZ4PgWBCMmHTUkU8m4uP/uFIRRF8V96dqgIwCgV5UVCyTxMe7 LQaHRFeOoGTY/gWWmj/Q1J1rv3W3yp+ny7SVSy3v/Xy2cHI9jwMtvUIrOzH2hjHlR8Su pkXVBBghBxVNJGx+z/NXlD+6dM64CqDUFKAHBsRprx7VdtS6DaLE/z1QD3rLhNdh/k5O ZA9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6JpM+GoCsZCxTPDL1501rlrdnecfoYOOKVTp1OTRic90bejN4C JuBRvPI1t9058V5WadrDzdeyC2UoqQ== X-Received: by 10.159.49.86 with SMTP id n22mr4954842uab.157.1492725906902; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:05:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.59.139 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.59.139 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:05:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jon Pike Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:05:06 -0700 Message-ID: To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045ddcac6d9541054da05520 Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake] Current status and recommendations for APU2C*/ArcherC7 and ath10k platforms? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:05:07 -0000 --f403045ddcac6d9541054da05520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * >1. What's the status of make >wifi fast on the ath10k now, or >did it *>* make it there yet? * >Well, the queue rework is in >there, but only enabled for >certain >hardware. Not for the Archer, >though... Bummer... Is there a handy list of which devices are MWFF functional on ath9k and ath= 10k? On Apr 20, 2017 2:13 PM, "Jon Pike" wrote: > >The 17.01 LEDE release is great for >both the C7 and the WNDR3800, and > > has all the WiFi-related fixes (bufferbloat fixes and airtime fairness) > included. You'll probably need something beefier for a main gateway at > those speeds, though. Not sure about the APU2; think it is supported in > >LEDE as well? > > Just a note, I have a C7, and it might just be able to get by at your spe= eds. Actually, have a 300/30mbit cable connection, so I've done a lot of ex= perimenting to see how much of that it can handle. The limit seems to be ab= out 120-140 (set) with measured speed being 100-125mbit, with Cake running,= before my C7 starts hitting 0% idle. Now, only ingress is that fast, with= the egress much slower, not sure if it would he worse case with both abou= t as fast. No SQM, or SQM on the 30mbit egress only, and it's good to >340= mbit. > > Thought this might be a good place to ask a question or two abt the wifi = fast stuff... while Toke's listening. > > 1. What's the status of make wifi fast on the ath10k now, or did it make = it there yet? > > 2. Is there any benefit or reason to use (or not) the optional Caldera at= h10k driver vs the standard one? (Possibly no MWFF connection) > > TNX... > > --f403045ddcac6d9541054da05520 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 
 >1. What's=
 the status of make >wifi fast on the ath10k now, or >did it
> make it there yet?

>Well, the queue rework is in >there, but only enabled for >certai=
n
>hardware. Not for the Archer, >though...
Bummer...   
Is ther=
e a handy list of which devices are MWFF functional on ath9k and ath10k?

On Apr 2= 0, 2017 2:13 PM, "Jon Pike" <jonpike54@gmail.com> wrote:
>The 17.01 LEDE release is great for >both the C7 and the WNDR3800, = and
has all the WiFi-related fixe=
s (bufferbloat fixes and airtime fairness)
included. You'll probably need something beefier for a main gateway at
those speeds, though. Not sure about the APU2; think it is supported in
>LEDE as well?
Just a note, I h=
ave a C7, and it might just be able to get by at your speeds. Actually, hav=
e a 300/30mbit cable connection, so I've done a lot of experimenting to=
 see how much of that it can handle. The limit seems to be about 120-140 (s=
et) with measured speed being 100-125mbit, with Cake running, before my C7 =
starts hitting 0% idle.  Now, only ingress is that fast, with the egress mu=
ch slower, not sure if it would he  worse case with both about as fast.  No=
 SQM, or SQM on the 30mbit egress only, and it's good to >340mbit.
Thought this might be a good place =
to ask a question or two abt the wifi fast stuff... while Toke's listen=
ing.
1. What's the status of m=
ake wifi fast on the ath10k now, or did it make it there yet?
2. Is there any benefit or reason to use (or no=
t) the optional Caldera ath10k driver vs the standard one? (Possibly no MWF=
F connection)
TNX...
--f403045ddcac6d9541054da05520--