Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100

[Bret Towe <bret.towe@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1752 bytes --]

I'm willing to-do tests just let me know what's required to-do so
current "router" is an arch Linux computer connected directly to the modem

On Nov 16, 2017 6:29 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:

>
> > On Nov 16, 2017, at 14:55, Bret Towe <bret.towe@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have a docsis setup atm that is 300/7
>
> 300/7 = 42.9/1
>
> This is extreme, I do not envy you at all. I would venture a guess that
> your ISP would be a prime candidate for doing ACK filtering/thinning in its
> CPE. Is there an easy way to compare sent versus received ACKs over the
> internet?
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2017 8:28 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is a much saner test result[1], showing about a 20% improvement
> > under the rrul_be test. I scaled back the topology to two instances of
> > cake on the middlebox, shaping to 100mbits on one side and 10mbits on
> > the other, and flipped filtering on or off. The win will improve more
> > with upload/download ratios of ever worse than 10/1, and the rrul is
> > not exactly a test of real traffic.
> >
> > What other ratios are out there, particularly in the dsl world?
> >
> > I can think of a few ways to get more acks to filter out, for example,
> > not using the "sparse flow optimization" for acks.
> >
> > [1] it also turned out my test target box, an odroid c2, couldn't push
> > more than 500mbits bidir in the first place.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cake mailing list
> > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cake mailing list
> > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2693 bytes --]