From: Bret Towe <bret.towe@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:55:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM+OQmBjXe6=-TOjA=FMd4HPByrhWseheO=AOpjFR19Ow8Kctw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]
I have a docsis setup atm that is 300/7
On Nov 15, 2017 8:28 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a much saner test result[1], showing about a 20% improvement
> under the rrul_be test. I scaled back the topology to two instances of
> cake on the middlebox, shaping to 100mbits on one side and 10mbits on
> the other, and flipped filtering on or off. The win will improve more
> with upload/download ratios of ever worse than 10/1, and the rrul is
> not exactly a test of real traffic.
>
> What other ratios are out there, particularly in the dsl world?
>
> I can think of a few ways to get more acks to filter out, for example,
> not using the "sparse flow optimization" for acks.
>
> [1] it also turned out my test target box, an odroid c2, couldn't push
> more than 500mbits bidir in the first place.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1503 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 3:13 Dave Taht
2017-11-16 3:45 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-16 4:28 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-16 11:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 13:55 ` Bret Towe [this message]
2017-11-16 14:29 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 14:33 ` Bret Towe
2017-11-16 15:03 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-16 16:25 ` Dave Taht
[not found] <mailman.1021.1510806526.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-16 9:24 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-16 12:47 ` Alan Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM+OQmBjXe6=-TOjA=FMd4HPByrhWseheO=AOpjFR19Ow8Kctw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bret.towe@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox