From: "Jonas Mårtensson" <martensson.jonas@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Testing variants of the MTU latency scaling
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 21:04:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9iV=+RfjRYCm3SnDyHovjbNTbbBcNpOvJNVA_+rNXbaO6_gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877eow96a3.fsf@toke.dk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 818 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
wrote:
> Jonas Mårtensson <martensson.jonas@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > One thing that is still not clear to me from these results: if I run
> > cake on an IFB without ingress mode (i.e. the default?), does the MTU
> > scaling have any impact on TCP download throughput?
>
> Odds are that not using ingress mode will make Cake lose control of the
> bottleneck (that is what happened when I tried running a quick test),
> and so will mess up both latency and throughput as you hit the bloated
> upstream link buffer...
So using cake through sqm-scripts in OpenWRT/LEDE for ingress shaping does
not currently work very well then? I guess the sqm-scripts should be
updated to actually use ingress mode at some point...
/Jonas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1245 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-22 20:46 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-22 21:09 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-22 21:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-23 11:23 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-24 11:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-24 19:04 ` Jonas Mårtensson [this message]
2018-04-24 19:22 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2018-04-24 20:27 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-24 21:11 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-23 9:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-23 10:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-23 10:50 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-24 8:11 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2018-04-24 8:14 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-24 8:29 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9iV=+RfjRYCm3SnDyHovjbNTbbBcNpOvJNVA_+rNXbaO6_gA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=martensson.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox