From: "Jonas Mårtensson" <martensson.jonas@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] A few puzzling Cake results
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:06:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9iV=+xQVY2h7eQa1WDVFD=JN=U1xoq4oia0fdrB2ByQZeycw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6jWnVw1_6N6G4P3YmBy+jH6XeBXTaYvD7Pg7iqvYxiOw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2069 bytes --]
Dave, in the thread referenced earlier that led to this change you said:
"The loss of throughput here compared to non-ingress mode is a blocker for
mainlining and for that matter, wedging this into lede."
I'm curious, what would the latency be in Toke's experiment with
non-ingress mode and with the 4 MTU change reverted? The same as for
fq_codel?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jonathan:
>
> I think you are wrong. What we care about is keeping packets in flight
> across the network, with a queue length as close to 1 packet as
> possible.
>
> If it breaks ingress mode so be it.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On 18 Apr, 2018, at 7:11 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> What you're saying here is that you basically don't believe there are
> >> any applications where a bulk TCP flow would also want low queueing
> >> latency? :)
> >
> > I'm saying that there's a tradeoff between intra-flow induced latency
> and packet loss, and I've chosen 4 MTUs as the operating point.
> >
> > Bear in mind that with high packet loss, the retransmissions take an
> extra RTT to complete in any case, and there's a higher probability of
> incurring an RTO which will *really* hurt your intra-flow latency.
> >
> > This equation is modified with ECN because a high signalling rate
> doesn't result in packet loss or retransmissions, but I'm not presently
> making any decisions based on ECN support, except the obvious one of
> whether to mark or drop.
> >
> > - Jonathan Morton
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cake mailing list
> > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-669-226-2619
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3182 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 9:42 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-17 10:04 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-04-17 10:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-17 12:05 ` Y
[not found] ` <mailman.225.1523966725.3573.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2018-04-17 12:22 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-17 13:16 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-17 13:50 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-17 13:47 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-04-17 13:52 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-04-17 14:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-17 14:54 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-04-17 15:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-17 14:03 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-17 14:17 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-18 11:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-18 12:21 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2018-04-18 12:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-18 13:13 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-18 13:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-18 14:12 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-18 14:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-18 15:03 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-18 15:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-18 15:58 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-18 16:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-18 16:25 ` Dave Taht
2018-04-18 16:34 ` Georgios Amanakis
2018-04-18 17:10 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-19 7:49 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-04-19 8:11 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-19 9:00 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-19 9:21 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-19 9:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-19 9:55 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-19 10:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-19 11:55 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-04-18 16:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-18 17:02 ` Dave Taht
2018-04-18 18:06 ` Jonas Mårtensson [this message]
2018-04-18 18:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-18 18:16 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
[not found] ` <mailman.238.1524075384.3573.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2018-04-19 8:31 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2018-04-18 18:11 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-18 19:53 ` David Lang
2018-04-18 21:53 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-19 9:22 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-19 9:32 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9iV=+xQVY2h7eQa1WDVFD=JN=U1xoq4oia0fdrB2ByQZeycw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=martensson.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox