From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it1-x134.google.com (mail-it1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025813B29E for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 17:05:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-it1-x134.google.com with SMTP id a6so17651245itl.4 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 14:05:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=L5q0jE3/BE/TpS5i0qPBnmdhpF1tpJSGDTwpLkqNj58=; b=nLkK+sXZTIxl+KthLN6zeyIRmdWHT+cuBiyf8CohBMuWZM30P/kVXZIN0vN+sDc1YA 3OfNaq4Ug68wsdo9pMQBOgu9oAkthksswqUBCLHXq/GPaPYotIezkTbWIeAA2xwKe6GH ZcdbjhazndL3hq923XR0Y1PMK2FG9qSdZQlw4Mi5DQBLgQoF+LrdJV/XsbUO3DPEJ7FN IM8dAxvL1dNGSVOjq6IRjW+63YEmku/W6kxytOucQWQrs1lphI2widibMExbiUTltpl9 tlaInRULqHNnqC+qqN8RT7kf8dKSQLQ3Z8og1shoMqZIbWpHOpxt3UtxxzuFr6Utw28/ wmaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=L5q0jE3/BE/TpS5i0qPBnmdhpF1tpJSGDTwpLkqNj58=; b=LlXa/9Cn6olfEaf8XSnfJVN/BCP5AmHQARWcmzM4IB2ChdKE7XZFAPdgVWQHcK/Us0 /QcCdRMTE4lUUERD9ek2ynQZYLBodpHzMSspD1KuDExqe3LUtWN8TG5YIdDHiP5lmDzE GA9vOqeWG5DwhU0eZ/BQ3dUuprKqb8Det5A94jVXzdWR07P/IbNT8iIpbOacC+aYDtu5 +WvCMHaQ1LPhPW4GfpNBm40uzVXb3wmHoNdUBvRf5MhgHavp3tVTJkKApqLwParZKHfC aXjYGkNGR2sTxpR6ZQ9V803N8iaUXigK2N9v20LdE9TrZH2H3kVKhpnzKRQ8rmXmwHMB sysA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZfOotqBk+G8eZn32CakI952R8zBEdcu3ED+X42UnzXAbB4dw4E sWeM6T+HoxNALp7KGKALcY5cLtZSakF5iIJhqwF+Zw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZ36GNavUZp67Q68o0IAfghZXcqQ+luVLyvp4ZrJJqtWPIXBhRrW7Wz5JCC4AfsFrwz9Y+YZkHlUrzxmSE5ZhM= X-Received: by 2002:a24:3390:: with SMTP id k138mr6620865itk.132.1549231502060; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 14:05:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jonas_M=C3=A5rtensson?= Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 23:04:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Cake List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005af2600581049182" Subject: [Cake] separate shaping of wifi X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 22:05:03 -0000 --0000000000005af2600581049182 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I'm running OpenWrt with sqm on my home router. Is there any potential problem with enabling sqm with cake on both eth0 (wan) and wlan0? The reason for doing this is that if I only do shaping on the wan interface I still get bad uplink bufferbloat on wifi. I assume this is because the bottleneck in this case is actually the wifi and the bloat is in the end device (laptop, phone, etc.). By shaping to a rate lower than the wifi rate, the bloat disappears. Is there any better way to accomplish this than to enable a second sqm instance on wlan0 if I don't want to sacrifice speed for wired devices? /Jonas --0000000000005af2600581049182 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm running OpenWrt with sqm on my home router. Is the= re any potential problem with enabling sqm with cake on both eth0 (wan) and= wlan0? The reason for doing this is that if I only do shaping on the wan i= nterface I still get bad uplink bufferbloat on wifi. I assume this is becau= se the bottleneck in this case is actually the wifi and the bloat is in the= end device (laptop, phone, etc.). By shaping to a rate lower than the wifi= rate, the bloat disappears. Is there any better way to accomplish this tha= n to enable a second sqm instance on wlan0 if I don't want to sacrifice= speed for wired devices?

/Jonas=C2=A0
--0000000000005af2600581049182--