From: "Jonas Mårtensson" <martensson.jonas@gmail.com>
To: pete@heistp.net
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] lanman2018 cake talk ideas
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:55:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9iV=Jh609oXy2M-1Lox5bqQPw0f2Ldkhsq_Xd0RWcKiV4Bfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE22DF3D-33D7-4D5F-92DB-CDD6D0CBDF46@heistp.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1545 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:04 AM Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 21, 2018, at 5:43 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think your "megabit myth" idea (and language) would be a very
> > powerful paper and/or talk to try and hammer home in multiple venues.
> >
> > I might spend a slide on it at this conference, but it deserves more
> > focus than that.
>
> Ok, I’ve finally got a few freer days coming up, so I’ll see if I can’t
> make progress on backed up tasks, then maybe write something up on this.
> Might retreat from the lists meanwhile.
>
> On slide #4: Ubiquity -> Ubiquiti. And consider adding Verizon. My mother
> has Verizon Fios (50Mbit symmetric fiber) near Philly and that was the
> connection I referred to earlier- it just doesn’t feel like 50Mbit
> symmetric fiber should.
>
> As a side note, Google as a whole seems responsible as far as the big four
> go when it comes to bloat (and other things). BBR advanced the state of
> things, and they financed it after all, so it deserves some appreciation,
> to the devs as well. Worth mentioning in this preso? :)
>
> I like the Cake vs Sonic Fiber slide, and would like to hear the
> commentary. In case they video the presentation, do post a link. Best of
> luck!
>
I like the slide too but what exactly do you mean by "Cake gets inside the
GPON request/grant loop"?
Now, even more impressive would be a Cake vs Google Fiber plot, showing a
reduction of latency under load from ~2000ms to a few ms.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1958 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 17:44 Dave Taht
2018-06-18 17:50 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2018-06-18 17:52 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2018-06-20 8:25 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-06-20 15:45 ` Pete Heist
2018-06-21 3:43 ` Dave Taht
2018-06-21 7:04 ` Pete Heist
2018-06-21 7:55 ` Jonas Mårtensson [this message]
2018-06-21 9:42 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-06-22 7:45 Felix Resch
2018-06-22 8:05 ` Pete Heist
2018-06-23 5:14 ` Dave Taht
2018-06-23 5:35 ` Dave Taht
2018-06-23 7:12 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-06-26 6:58 ` Dave Taht
2018-06-26 8:33 ` Pete Heist
2018-06-26 10:52 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-06-26 13:13 ` Dave Taht
2018-06-26 8:34 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9iV=Jh609oXy2M-1Lox5bqQPw0f2Ldkhsq_Xd0RWcKiV4Bfg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=martensson.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=pete@heistp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox