On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > On 18 Apr, 2018, at 7:11 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
> wrote:
> >
> > What you're saying here is that you basically don't believe there are
> > any applications where a bulk TCP flow would also want low queueing
> > latency? :)
>
> I'm saying that there's a tradeoff between intra-flow induced latency and
> packet loss, and I've chosen 4 MTUs as the operating point.


Jonathan, in the last commit you went from 1 MTU to 4 MTUs. Stupid question
maybe but did you also test 2 and 3 MTUs?

/Jonas