On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 Apr, 2018, at 7:11 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>
> What you're saying here is that you basically don't believe there are
> any applications where a bulk TCP flow would also want low queueing
> latency? :)

I'm saying that there's a tradeoff between intra-flow induced latency and packet loss, and I've chosen 4 MTUs as the operating point.

Jonathan, in the last commit you went from 1 MTU to 4 MTUs. Stupid question maybe but did you also test 2 and 3 MTUs?

/Jonas