From: "Jonas Mårtensson" <martensson.jonas@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: "Cake List" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake not more CPU efficient than HTB+FQ-CoDel (anymore)?
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 21:56:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9iV=KuWLROLBUo6bcjS6p7aE2nJXu87JecHe3n9bbvE9NNOw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EFCDE2B1-1FE0-498F-8ACA-9CFA01762636@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2536 bytes --]
Well, simplest.qos.help says "Simplest possible configuration: HTB rate
limiter with your qdisc attached" so that is probably also a bit misleading.
/Jonas
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> just looked at the code and my recollection is wrong. I could have sworn
> that I purged cake as a shaper from simple.qos when I created
> piece_of_cake, but apparently that was just a fever dream...
>
> Sorry for the noise.
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 2018, at 21:26, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On April 11, 2018 8:55:12 PM GMT+02:00, "Jonas Mårtensson" <
> martensson.jonas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>>> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 6:24 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, um, did we cram so many features into Cake that it no longer
> >> uses
> >>>>> less CPU? Can anyone confirm these results?
> >>>>
> >>>> To be sure about this, it seems wise to configure Cake to turn off
> >> as
> >>>> many of the new features as possible. That means selecting
> >> "besteffort
> >>>> flows nonat" mode at least.
> >>>>
> >>>> I forget whether simplest.qos correctly uses the built-in shaper
> >> with
> >>>> Cake, rather than just layering it with HTB as usual. If not, then
> >> of
> >>>> course Cake will use more CPU, and we should be grateful that it's
> >> by
> >>>> a relatively small margin (maybe 15%).
> >>>
> >>> It is definitely using Cake as the shaper; in besteffort mode, but
> >> with
> >>> nat and triple-isolation enabled I think. I'll run another test
> >> tomorrow
> >>> with those disabled.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there any difference between using simplest.qos and
> >> piece_of_cake.qos
> >> when Cake is used as qdisc?
> >
> > Yes, IIRC simplest.qos with cake as qdisc will use HTB as shaper and
> cake as leaf qdisc, while piece_of_cake.qos will use cake both as shaper
> and leaf qdisc. The former is only useful for comparative testing, for
> actual usage I recommend the later.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> >>
> >> /Jonas
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cake mailing list
> > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3865 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-11 15:24 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 15:41 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-11 17:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 17:23 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-11 17:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 17:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-04-11 18:55 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2018-04-11 19:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 19:26 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-11 19:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-04-11 19:56 ` Jonas Mårtensson [this message]
2018-04-12 10:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-11 16:03 ` Pete Heist
2018-04-11 17:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-04-14 4:48 ` There is cake qdisc manual Y
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9iV=KuWLROLBUo6bcjS6p7aE2nJXu87JecHe3n9bbvE9NNOw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=martensson.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox