From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1DD73B2A3 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:07:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id a103so70772696ioj.1 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:07:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mithrandi.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0cwH1dSCkN1SVRC1qM/vEQfpegQQLRtYBbz4t6rTv8c=; b=BAlscKblJ2V9vbxebklHF376QMNo9Fsb71qab9EFrfPa4pSCqKeviWajiz3ussmcGf K0McE+a9unPA/Xt+4hgMoKgtAdcOyhCGZbSoAwi7N6Bxv8KDsS1u4LHiJVBOSnDu9zKx TS/4WiyYv/1mrmPJggDvFeqn+DqDfXar7vxbg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0cwH1dSCkN1SVRC1qM/vEQfpegQQLRtYBbz4t6rTv8c=; b=SGK96I4/4xyfjEZF23jGe3qYlI9UkjJM85WPGiOMpNULgh7ACQzkPihiJbdRhevLP7 D+TIxPwXT9A5TMPfQdpr6YKVvZGUzGinsIm8c7wJSc0zbrIOgfjlD0OV3kSlEKkOXaer NOFeeZM37JpVveFuXbrWGsyVQ/DprxkQuTkDFm8sQo8Zd9yKnH4RHJLcr+C5d1xYPDT1 bWWKi3I5WvvI8dfj2No88xME102gpy29q6saPMDvxD0LUVzkHHwa7oJ8qEbXnmyB+pSe v/XaSzwvcqv5WCg3OXp4iPMudDvKtpjc/7drGRhOgmUPXFdCl4noBgxxV+y5ctnxLA03 83Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6i48LpD//rF2LcI7TnazLPsstnnepIJErHBUnB/gQMDUwCiPn/ DE3hdKIlx21ixBbxl3IGdrissWPBPBz7 X-Received: by 10.157.36.137 with SMTP id z9mr5599633ota.186.1493402859345; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:07:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tristan Seligmann Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? To: Lochnair , erik.taraldsen@telenor.com Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c035564f02c21054e3df255 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:07:40 -0000 --94eb2c035564f02c21054e3df255 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 at 18:39 Lochnair via Cake wrote: > In terms of expected performance, I've seen tests on the ER-Lite come > out at about ~80Mb/20Mb on a 200Mb/20Mb link. I've not been able to do > any "perf" runs on it myself, as my only one is in production. I don't > have an ER-X, but one of the guys on the UBNT forum claimed to get > ~120-140 Mbit symmetric on the ER-X model. > My connection is only 100/100 Mbps but I have cake installed in both egress and ingress directions on my ER-X and it seems like I have CPU to spare even when loading the link in both directions. --94eb2c035564f02c21054e3df255 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 28 Apr= 2017 at 18:39 Lochnair via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
In terms of expected performance, I've seen tests on the= ER-Lite come
out at about ~80Mb/20Mb on a 200Mb/20Mb link. I've not been able to do<= br> any "perf" runs on it myself, as my only one is in production. I = don't
have an ER-X, but one of the guys on the UBNT forum claimed to get
~120-140 Mbit symmetric on the ER-X model.

<= div>My connection is only 100/100 Mbps but I have cake installed in both eg= ress and ingress directions on my ER-X and it seems like I have CPU to spar= e even when loading the link in both directions.
--94eb2c035564f02c21054e3df255--