From: Ryan Mounce <ryan@mounce.com.au>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>,
"cake@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] act_conndscp
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:22:26 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN+fvRa5OPFhJ3bqv45QfD=vBwEYj=tvTpzCCRAMz=EEBYVcTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <380EDD79-EC7A-4D43-8BF5-CA2E8366FE59@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 00:37, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
<kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 23 Mar 2019, at 18:35, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 22 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like act_conndscp has been shot down by the kernel people, at least in its current form. Setting a conntrack mark from tc is regarded as “not sure if it is a good idea”. The other way (conntrack to skb) is fine. That’s sort of good news in that ingress is the hard bit as it’s problematic with iptables.
> >>
> >> egress is within iptables coverage - ‘just’ need a way to store a DSCP & flag to conntrack mark.
> >
> > Never give in, never surrender.
> >
>
> Given in. Surrendered.
:(
FWIW I've applied an updated patch with your iptables 'abomination'
and it's been working without issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 20:08 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-19 21:24 ` Ryan Mounce
2019-03-19 21:27 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-19 21:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-19 21:51 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-19 21:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-20 3:31 ` Ryan Mounce
2019-03-20 8:25 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-20 8:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-20 9:01 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-20 9:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-20 10:15 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-22 21:24 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-23 18:35 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-04-01 14:07 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-04-01 23:52 ` Ryan Mounce [this message]
2019-03-20 9:06 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-03-20 9:24 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN+fvRa5OPFhJ3bqv45QfD=vBwEYj=tvTpzCCRAMz=EEBYVcTg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ryan@mounce.com.au \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox