From: "techicist@gmail.com" <techicist@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Configuring cake for VDSL2 bridged connection
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:13:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiaOCnzMOh486gzv=hu7A7zwpA1s52EV1KR+DXBqrowOU2qRg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C03A147E-9785-4E27-85C0-E52E18868791@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1287 bytes --]
Hello,
Thank you for your quick reply.
I take it that one of the DHCPs should read PPPoE?
Yes, you are quite correct. It should read: "TalkTalk uses DHCP to obtain
an IP address and not PPPoE as most other ISPs do." But I think you
understood that :)
My sync speeds on VDSL2 have been very stable for the last 84+ days so my
calculated figures will stay the same for some time, I would like to think.
My DS sync speed is 58976Kbps and thus I have calculated a reference value
of 58068Kbps based on your formula. The US sync speed is 10422Kbps and the
reference value for this is 10261Kbps.
Setting the reference values to 50%, I have: 29034Kbps for the DS; and
5130Kbps for the US. I will test with these numbers shortly. Am I right to
assume I can just paste these into the SQM interface on LuCI? I will set
the "Queuing discipline" to *cake* and the "Queue setup script" to
*piece_of_cake.qos*.
I assume also at this stage, to set "Which link layer to account for" as *none
(default)*?
I will then increment the values I have pasted into LuCI (assuming that is
correct) as you have said. At this point, with an assumed overhead of 8, do
I just choose *Ethernet with overhead...* and then set the "Per Packet
Overhead (byte)" to *8*?
Is there any benefit of going through UCI?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1780 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-23 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-23 13:44 techicist
2016-08-23 14:27 ` moeller0
2016-08-23 15:13 ` techicist [this message]
2016-08-23 20:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2016-08-24 17:01 ` techicist
2016-08-24 17:03 ` techicist
2016-08-24 17:03 ` techicist
2016-08-24 17:16 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-08-24 19:33 ` techicist
2016-08-24 19:47 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-08-24 19:49 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-08-25 14:53 ` techicist
2016-08-26 8:14 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-08-26 11:15 ` techicist
2016-08-26 11:29 ` moeller0
2016-08-26 11:32 ` techicist
2016-08-27 7:43 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-08-27 16:17 ` techicist
2016-08-27 17:48 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-09-14 20:06 ` techicist
2016-09-14 20:41 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2016-09-14 20:48 ` Sebastian Moeller
2016-09-15 9:24 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2016-09-15 9:43 ` techicist
2016-08-26 11:52 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-08-26 12:04 ` techicist
2016-08-27 7:31 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-08-24 8:52 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANiaOCnzMOh486gzv=hu7A7zwpA1s52EV1KR+DXBqrowOU2qRg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=techicist@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox