Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Henrion <zoobab@gmail.com>
To: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org>
Cc: fcc@lists.prplfoundation.org,
	make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Battlemesh] [OpenWrt-Devel] the cerowrt project's letter to the fcc about the wifi lockdown is nearly final
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:21:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANjd3ndr7WBSvmB2SaLi0FQmyNYZ10w09L7SFkZw1JNN45O8EQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151006134915.GF12763@odroid>

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:13:36AM +0200, Dave Taht wrote:
>> Comment away!
>
> There are many good points made in this text.
>
> I like the Volkswagen example and the suggestion to require
> opening up the firmware.
>
> For the latter, had been thinking about that before briefly,
> but kind of dismissed it early, basically because the reasoning in
> my head was that FCC shouldn't make any requirements regarding
> the form of the software at all. They should only regulate the
> result.

Blobs cannot be trusted to do the right thing.

--
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-06 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-06  0:13 [Cake] " Dave Taht
2015-10-06 12:03 ` [Cake] [Bloat] " Rich Brown
2015-10-06 13:49 ` [Cake] [OpenWrt-Devel] " Linus Lüssing
2015-10-06 14:21   ` Benjamin Henrion [this message]
2015-10-06 15:17     ` [Cake] [Battlemesh] " Linus Lüssing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANjd3ndr7WBSvmB2SaLi0FQmyNYZ10w09L7SFkZw1JNN45O8EQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=zoobab@gmail.com \
    --cc=battlemesh@ml.ninux.org \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=fcc@lists.prplfoundation.org \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox