From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914C921F3D2 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 02:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkp63 with SMTP id 63so8253024qkp.0 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 02:50:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kcDjVEI8RfHleya7LMvxNuuABv4WTogFn7E7yd5FDsc=; b=b310OOwh5mwbWeIDp8pGt4kkZ3QVUh8LnkqCX9h0GFgsCGJTH4aIlDdbC3G1006K4Q vaEC+oF9jTsja12Ae6r7sj0lsXwoa/lTSheWwVJR4ztjpoRwZVkhHm2YqCCQP4uRjtoX g5cw6rZnlvdqlOP7ShuzNFHGR3xaCjMPRt3G7EBklNDBVQI9k4DUYgRfjnX/Dw4C70uy /OFDtSl2+RWYKWXz40Gpm84DfBUy+sykhw6mCgFiWfYXY3/FjVVM3boOBXg2BKoLxLKl +5WYWzbOx2XsjpmbVwcjrc77EZXprnL2HcXCbjJnL0E+XBXj2oVIf7asn79e/JdllKX+ GitQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.20.133 with SMTP id 5mr740045qku.75.1431597014770; Thu, 14 May 2015 02:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.183.194 with HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2015 02:50:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <554F9594.60808@gmail.com> References: <554F64E1.6000609@gmail.com> <554F9594.60808@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 10:50:14 +0100 Message-ID: From: Alan Jenkins To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Cake] openwrt build with latest cake and other qdiscs X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 09:50:45 -0000 On 10/05/2015, Alan Jenkins wrote: > > SQM seems to win from having "overhead 40", which I can't configure in > cake. . (In less demanding cases there's little difference though). In my continuing quest to learn tc syntax... I report that 'tc stab overhead 40' works correctly with 'tc cake atm'. It reduces the latency in this case, no difference from SQM with the same setting. Can't ask for more than that :). Assuming there's a new cake build at some point, I will happily try 'tc cake overhead 40'. I'm not really watching the router CPU. It seems to be running at below 20% (all in softirq). Alan Also learnt netperf-wrapper --gui and --batch. Really nice tooling, without it I'd be getting confused and tired by now.