From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954953B29D for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:13:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id k22so7503676ljg.3 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:13:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fyFQm2UdR7TUyEIBmMuqHqg2yG7FYGFrXlFLAr/mpKY=; b=cWY/G/e3JNGOsO9dJr9F+gpq+rAzA29fQjVNIQSqxWkkLh+fAYFqG55YCTzI4lrWvE CICDE/qe39HUPzbSKxgRRPyPP33RlhO/9X72U0xKkmCpHsbiAJrlzpOHXGogKKp++/5N NGUSDVCD4p2xNTkllW3THj1JOsLJqyCkAR7o8XXjKlf/vTCnJVlbUtjvPGfU/aFmTKu4 01SnhzDmt/GAwOKM/vRK0wUhoDMEN9jgCLfrf0o/Aoa8caEJLdfo0uYiP+5sir2Adjq5 5xYJm+D3OcpLH8lRQfWfoycovf8AY+rLSlEtUYbB1SN0Dflbvl7jGgibgGpLvdfAqSJb AFDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fyFQm2UdR7TUyEIBmMuqHqg2yG7FYGFrXlFLAr/mpKY=; b=mEiesE6aOMj54d2ASFJvrqW3sW1eVcF39t6qZrHEjXkUt4NR+FEeU9VFq1HNFadSln h1OqPWl6fAijKoNX8bV3bdfOLC+xvO2IE0/FzUEQDc0Dp376LF1qbPb/Fkc2ifXrYiN0 oqnz6MGnXZTHX6KqSODn4Eq/O/6oovDgf80XUe9zhzoA2aH9enrPjWo8RziQV5JVIsrZ rmjKq1jjSUqnP15Yc9tWmzX5v3/ad1Sd9EFnAWFrYwUMzYN766KBx1R/8MNXyagrm6MC /G+pzsoKZ1v1ZRABCMoqzJdwJURomqcda9Ez3w5ZXNmV79BDJ/QYV183gLqYkBL63VME kXUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gMHUHjqes6+CNsgK2qcKtRXA4GOBK6WzeVVhU1g7m3hEVyhtB 9iPVgyInYOpJiuE1J3WfawhCrj0z8yU16Cpx0FU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDTEm6+vI9jiVo8YqEEbuiodfa9oeanpHGiAfEahQsQwkcWllP7zFkRw2CHZWPCf1EZYZXgQ1ZnZuQ18fRGDE= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:42d3:: with SMTP id n19mr3345782lfl.447.1613675600297; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:13:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87mtw1kx9c.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87mtw1kx9c.fsf@toke.dk> From: Peter Lepeska Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:13:08 -0500 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f043de05bba120ab" Subject: Re: [Cake] Enforcing video quality question X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:13:21 -0000 --000000000000f043de05bba120ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A user on the OpenWrt forum suggested hashlimit rules supported by iptables. How does that idea sound to you? Thanks! Peter On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 2:10 PM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Peter Lepeska writes: > > > Not sure this is the right forum but I am using Cake on my OpenWRT rout= er > > so I thought I would cross-post this question ( > > https://forum.openwrt.org/t/use-sqm-to-configure-video-quality/88984) > here. > > CAKE doesn't have any facilities to do per-device shaping like you're > asking, no. You could use fwmark to always put traffic into a lower > priority bin, but that still only limits in the aggregate, it's not a > per-device thing. > > What you'd need is something like an HTB policy that puts each internal > IP into its own bin and caps the bandwidth of each. You could write a > .qos script and integrate it into sqm-scripts, but I don't think there's > anything already in there that would do what you want either... > > -Toke > --000000000000f043de05bba120ab Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A user on the OpenWrt forum suggested hashlimit rules supp= orted by iptables. How does that idea sound to you?

Than= ks!

Peter

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 2:10 PM Tok= e H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke= .dk> wrote:
Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> writes:

> Not sure this is the right forum but I am using Cake on my OpenWRT rou= ter
> so I thought I would cross-post this question (
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t= /use-sqm-to-configure-video-quality/88984) here.

CAKE doesn't have any facilities to do per-device shaping like you'= re
asking, no. You could use fwmark to always put traffic into a lower
priority bin, but that still only limits in the aggregate, it's not a per-device thing.

What you'd need is something like an HTB policy that puts each internal=
IP into its own bin and caps the bandwidth of each. You could write a
.qos script and integrate it into sqm-scripts, but I don't think there&= #39;s
anything already in there that would do what you want either...

-Toke
--000000000000f043de05bba120ab--