On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant < kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote: > > > On 16/10/15 11:24, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Loganaden Velvindron > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Building the latest tc-adv causes issues with gcc. > > > > > > gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > > -Wmissing-declarations -Wold-style-definition -Wformat=2 -O2 > > -I../include -DRESOLVE_HOSTNAMES -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" > > -DCONFDIR=\"/etc/iproute2\" -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_SETNS -DHAVE_ELF > > -DCONFIG_GACT -DCONFIG_GACT_PROB > > -DIPT_LIB_DIR=\"/usr/lib/iptables\" -DYY_NO_INPUT -c -o > > q_cake0.o q_cake0.c > > In file included from q_cake.c:48:0: > > q_cake.c: In function > > ‘cake_print_xstats’:../include/utils.h:177:55: error: expected > > expression before ‘)’ token # define offsetof(type, member) ( > > (size_t) & ( (type *) 0 )->member ) > > ^q_cake.c:500:31: note: in expansion of > > macro ‘offsetof’ > > && RTA_PAYLOAD(xstats) >= offsetof(*stnc, capacity_estimate)) > > > > GCC version: > > gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC) > > > > > > The commit causing the issue is this one: > > > > > https://github.com/dtaht/tc-adv/commit/9b2dc094b2b1526ec4222efc1b0a1d02812def5a > > > > I'm not sure about the fix. here is it: > > > > https://github.com/dtaht/tc-adv/pull/7 > > > > > > > Hi Logan, > > Thanks for the report. It breaks here too :-( I'm annoyed with myself > for merging the latest, latest, latest commits (around 02:00 my time) > early this morning without at least compile testing them. I think it > was about 05:00 whilst doing an overnight shift (Aussie MotoGP) and the > box I did it on is a little out of date and slow (would require a > toolchain rebuild which is about 4 hours!) Normally I at least compile > test. Oh well, move on... > > I'm sure Jonathan will pick this up shortly - In fact as I type this > after just compile testing & installing your fix I notice that he has :-) > > Logan, thanks very much for your fix, it's appreciated. I will however > close your pull request and merge in the (identical!) fix from upstream > to keep the git histories a little closer. > > Thanks for updating the master tree. I was working on another issue, when I encountered this problem with the latest sync :) > Cheers, > > Kevin > > > >