From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
To: moeller0 <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] fq_codel on 3g network in Mauritius
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 22:36:39 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwR-s29C6kbEt-OutZEezXSwVritTZL7bL74+eOH54QZnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ECE7E7A-0310-4DC4-8AC9-29B0F1F2E383@gmx.de>
> It seems the initial burst like behavior from the earlier test was a false positive; these test are still not beautiful, but at least they do not indicate that HTB+fq_codel as configured on your system do not suffer from uncontrolled bursty-ness. Unfortunately, I have no real insight or advice to offer how to improve your situation (short f setting the shaper rates considerably lower).
> BTW, “tc -d qdisc” and “tc -s disc” give a bit more information, and “tc class show dev eth1” and “tc class show dev ifb4eth1” will also offer more detail about your setup.
>
>
> Best Regards
> Sebastian
>
>
>
tc -d qdisc:
qdisc fq_codel 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn
qdisc htb 1: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 r2q 10 default 12
direct_packets_stat 5 ver 3.17 direct_qlen 1000
qdisc fq_codel 110: dev eth1 parent 1:11 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms
qdisc fq_codel 120: dev eth1 parent 1:12 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms
qdisc fq_codel 130: dev eth1 parent 1:13 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms
qdisc ingress ffff: dev eth1 parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
qdisc mq 0: dev wlan0 root
qdisc htb 1: dev ifb4eth1 root refcnt 2 r2q 10 default 10
direct_packets_stat 0 ver 3.17 direct_qlen 32
qdisc fq_codel 110: dev ifb4eth1 parent 1:10 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn
tc -s qdisc:
qdisc fq_codel 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
maxpacket 256 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 0 ecn_mark 0
new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0
qdisc htb 1: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 r2q 10 default 12
direct_packets_stat 5 direct_qlen 1000
Sent 23456195 bytes 109776 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 86210 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 4p requeues 0
qdisc fq_codel 110: dev eth1 parent 1:11 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms
Sent 14760 bytes 164 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
maxpacket 256 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 163 ecn_mark 0
new_flows_len 1 old_flows_len 0
qdisc fq_codel 120: dev eth1 parent 1:12 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms
Sent 23440300 bytes 109600 pkt (dropped 115, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 5816b 4p requeues 0
maxpacket 1454 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 15749 ecn_mark 0
new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 1
qdisc fq_codel 130: dev eth1 parent 1:13 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
maxpacket 256 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 0 ecn_mark 0
new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0
qdisc ingress ffff: dev eth1 parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
Sent 190858989 bytes 149884 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc mq 0: dev wlan0 root
Sent 194287835 bytes 153002 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 7)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 7
qdisc htb 1: dev ifb4eth1 root refcnt 2 r2q 10 default 10
direct_packets_stat 0 direct_qlen 32
Sent 192953486 bytes 149877 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 41505 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc fq_codel 110: dev ifb4eth1 parent 1:10 limit 1001p flows 1024
quantum 300 target 500.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn
Sent 192953486 bytes 149877 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
maxpacket 1454 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 16778 ecn_mark 0
new_flows_len 1 old_flows_len 2
tc class show dev eth1
class htb 1:11 parent 1:1 leaf 110: prio 1 rate 128Kbit ceil 100Kbit
burst 1600b cburst 1600b
class htb 1:1 root rate 300Kbit ceil 300Kbit burst 1599b cburst 1599b
class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 prio 0 rate 300Kbit ceil 300Kbit burst 1599b
cburst 1599b
class htb 1:13 parent 1:1 leaf 130: prio 3 rate 50Kbit ceil 284Kbit
burst 1600b cburst 1599b
class htb 1:12 parent 1:1 leaf 120: prio 2 rate 50Kbit ceil 284Kbit
burst 1600b cburst 1599b
class fq_codel 110:188 parent 110:
class fq_codel 120:3d6 parent 120:
tc class show dev ifb4eth1:
class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 110: prio 0 rate 19600Kbit ceil
19600Kbit burst 1597b cburst 1597b
class htb 1:1 root rate 19600Kbit ceil 19600Kbit burst 1597b cburst 1597b
class fq_codel 110:2f1 parent 110:
class fq_codel 110:330 parent 110:
I changed the target from 350ms to 500ms for both ingress and egree,
and the throughput seem to be better:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4515961
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-23 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-19 4:29 Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-19 8:09 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-07-19 10:16 ` moeller0
[not found] ` <CAOp4FwQs9-PF=V5zDDMVj_38qmziKkeZECTyX1e8EfChtGm8bA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <7ECE7E7A-0310-4DC4-8AC9-29B0F1F2E383@gmx.de>
2016-07-23 18:36 ` Loganaden Velvindron [this message]
2016-07-23 18:59 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-24 5:53 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-24 6:12 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-24 7:03 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-24 8:27 ` moeller0
2016-07-24 8:43 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-24 10:53 ` moeller0
2016-07-24 11:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-07-24 14:40 ` moeller0
2016-07-24 16:18 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-07-24 17:13 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-24 17:21 ` moeller0
2016-07-24 19:43 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-25 4:13 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-26 21:10 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-30 3:45 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-30 13:04 ` Mario Ferreira
2016-07-30 13:48 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-07-30 14:07 ` Mario Ferreira
2016-08-03 18:52 ` Loganaden Velvindron
2016-08-03 19:48 ` David Lang
2016-07-19 17:13 ` Loganaden Velvindron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOp4FwR-s29C6kbEt-OutZEezXSwVritTZL7bL74+eOH54QZnQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=loganaden@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox