From: cam enih <nanericwang@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cake] CAKE on the bonding interface (master) or the bonded interfaces (slaves)?
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:57:46 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPB3MF4ApjawJtr=spCr92rBvPBwBnwGmwR+fsGdPot0pM6_zQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 286 bytes --]
Hi CAKE folks,
I'm new to traffic shaping, just a quick question here:
I have this virtual NIC set up and a few physical NICs bonded to it. Shall
I apply the CAKE algorithm on the virtual one or the physical ones, or all
of them? If either can do it, which is the best?
Thanks,
Eric
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 396 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 2:57 cam enih [this message]
2025-06-06 13:45 ` [Cake] CAKE on the bonding interface (master) or the bondedinterfaces (slaves)? Nils Andreas Svee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPB3MF4ApjawJtr=spCr92rBvPBwBnwGmwR+fsGdPot0pM6_zQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nanericwang@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox