From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B295A3B2A4 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 21:57:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-21644aca3a0so8526775ad.3 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:57:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1736996265; x=1737601065; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HmnvmJyoBAfZek1Z39Yc/vx8YCwg0GHFfAO/pOoJmSI=; b=QuwtKS98nrt9q9cP3rchN++gaEyAkgULBdQTz+TVkUCrxnu79Fo5DKdI5gHuzuLJnC ucLbKJ1S9VD9fsA2nROmCCIu/Ngy65KPMKmvzNAsDzwF4s9r0s9WPNwGdafLeBEBsSGx jCNW4X1oS61/f4nRmgBKkcYvgnn5Powo3nnvbo/qIEyUCTM/DSUxsSNoJ/NYJ79DO3TE sNVLDCTg0dToDiMwKgf4xqNRzTLcq7V/G/sj2nWWhdhS4dEeiaMNdkB575Kw08t7SlBM ysEqsHMbrdR5d/NkMT1LcCCquYhE78m0Dj+IAdSA6gqy4zxtvWdwIghK8v3ELpDPwanX Tulw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736996265; x=1737601065; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HmnvmJyoBAfZek1Z39Yc/vx8YCwg0GHFfAO/pOoJmSI=; b=OiqCyyjpe4hOE33i4jg+H5gyYKVtm0Dsp0ywFznImVNn1kOZnLGhl2jJkQ4RwDuHRa TmBvaqfP59aTnPYCcR9/5rM+5Ven7i0BuHHRVsmnllh0P8pDli252S4rxZtZpRWMdZ6G dZHmi5g3W92JOwvAgHv3OOONSNiFLixMpwP4KsE/TBr1uV6BJYuKQbxn5zx7N3QCLGf3 dbj3XIV5RiGMLVYlzEytC/S7OxWFw3CsW9vAAHQILPmoyFxp6Gbwidz2dabdguVGBlXC 5S+34j/KF5bHXBIe1QLn6X2rRFdPWn1QZcxpP+1Cgq24XHnzGoNK8nb0OnrCQsRHsdMF hg9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YywtdCv8lZM5hEcyyxkoX2Xo9Iz6vpib/P1pA2e7m1n39yJ0UGE X08/NwumIcHwU924sWwO/AwEAIiAhz1LnV49p3jRtOpT6jA+CdH/o3G6uix/2FdZM612H7ox233 jnQUcbzd4HcRa3pOorYjqEzIoSqdjsWw2Lww= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvg0E5yDSm80jotYhfqXHT8VtKClS7LB808nlM0NA7M3yC4tRmfPIQI1b0dM2m PQmART2Rh6YwGSi+cmNTW9xfaj2lnfJMsXEHJFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlVJxMrI9VA+n33KNeI6jaSLDetL/ad8hUTzGmGd6lWUeuT9NhPTs7G8t9LIUt199imjT9eHZVOOif134jysI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2613:b0:21b:d105:26c9 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-21bd1052a6amr95277495ad.18.1736996255268; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:57:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: cam enih X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvYZl9EojppYJZc0NcrLo0Jbzw4tY8VTt5wSSwKiMLMpakB8uNh6HF-wvjQ Message-ID: To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c58999062bc9f420" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 06:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Cake] CAKE on the bonding interface (master) or the bonded interfaces (slaves)? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:57:46 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 10:57:24 +0800 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:57:46 -0000 --000000000000c58999062bc9f420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi CAKE folks, I'm new to traffic shaping, just a quick question here: I have this virtual NIC set up and a few physical NICs bonded to it. Shall I apply the CAKE algorithm on the virtual one or the physical ones, or all of them? If either can do it, which is the best? Thanks, Eric --000000000000c58999062bc9f420 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi CAKE folks,

I'm new to traffic s= haping, just a quick question here:

I have this vi= rtual NIC set up and a few=C2=A0physical=C2=A0NICs bonded to it. Shall I ap= ply the CAKE algorithm on the virtual one or the physical ones, or all of t= hem? If either can do it, which is the best?

Thank= s,
Eric
--000000000000c58999062bc9f420--