Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: "Bjørn Ivar Teigen" <bjorn@domos.no>,
	"Cake List" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast]  Cake in mac80211
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:22:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC59BA6E-9C87-437E-A982-18D814EC2415@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9oluih6.fsf@taht.net>

> On 5 Feb, 2020, at 6:06 pm, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
> 
>>    D) "cobalt" is proving out better in several respects than pure
>>    codel,
>>    and folding in some of that makes sense, except I don't know which
>>    things are the most valuable considering wifi's other problems
>> 
>> Reading paper now. Thanks for the pointer.
> 
> I tend to think out that fq_codel is "good enough" in most
> circumstances. The edge cases that cake handles better are a matter of a
> few percentage points, vs orders of magnitude that we get with fq_codel
> alone vs a vs a FIFO, and my focus of late has been to make things that
> ate less cpu or were better offloadable than networked better. Others differ. 

I think COBALT might be worth putting in, as it should have essentially no net cost and does behave a little better than stock Codel.  It's better at handling unresponsive traffic, in particular.

 - Jonathan Morton


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-05 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-04 15:20 [Cake] " Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2020-02-04 15:25 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-02-04 17:07   ` Dave Taht
2020-02-05 11:53     ` Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2020-02-05 16:06       ` Dave Taht
2020-02-05 16:16         ` [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-02-05 16:22         ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2020-02-05 19:46           ` Dave Taht
2020-02-05 20:19 ` [Cake] " Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CC59BA6E-9C87-437E-A982-18D814EC2415@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn@domos.no \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave@taht.net \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox