From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
dtaht/sch_cake <sch_cake@noreply.github.com>,
dtaht/sch_cake
<reply+005e229ba97631443eb83ca2349a0192f870114806b4dedf92cf000000011233377a92a163ce00d139a3@reply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [sch_cake] Merge branch 'exposeinterval' (5541271)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:49:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D81663CA-F8D6-4C1A-BB0E-AA8E0DED1189@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7s85+Djym=14R--ygjpQ+-LJTat4gZ5+-Y82NxMjRezw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave,
On Oct 12, 2015, at 13:16 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> um, no, interval needs to be kept in usec, and converted more like I did.
I have not looked at your code yet. In tc (tc_utils.h or so) there is get_time() that knows how to deal with the default time specifiers like sec ms us… I believe from the tc side this should be used to parse the user input, just like Kevin’s code does. Now this needs to be passed to sch_cake.c, where I believe Kevin’s version expects milliseconds (MS2TIME(q->interval)), which does not do the right thing if the user specified “rtf 123usecs” on tic’s cli… So just getting rid of the MS2TIME called should do the trick, no?
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12 Oct, 2015, at 12:24, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is incorrect for the DC use case. We should be able to have the
>>>> target fall below at least 250us.
>>>
>>> Hey, I’m trying to work on this myself, but the code keeps changing under me.
>>
>> Tough. Deal with it. :) Once the rtt option works right toke and I can
>> finally go test the
>> count/2 idea out properly in the testbed, like, today. You otherwise
>> have the pen,
>> as far as I am concerned.
>>
>>>
>>> - Jonathan Morton
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>> Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Do you want faster, better, wifi? https://www.patreon.com/dtaht
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <dtaht/sch_cake/commit/55412714b3d0db929c2c7d3f84d881fb6db93ca1@github.com>
[not found] ` <dtaht/sch_cake/commit/55412714b3d0db929c2c7d3f84d881fb6db93ca1/13711779@github.com>
2015-10-12 9:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-10-12 9:24 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-12 9:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-12 9:36 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-12 11:16 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-12 11:49 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2015-10-12 12:04 ` Dave Taht
2015-10-12 12:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D81663CA-F8D6-4C1A-BB0E-AA8E0DED1189@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=reply+005e229ba97631443eb83ca2349a0192f870114806b4dedf92cf000000011233377a92a163ce00d139a3@reply.github.com \
--cc=sch_cake@noreply.github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox