From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F7921F8B7 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lbbwt4 with SMTP id wt4so112427174lbb.1 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:43:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=06novujeeWWiRfPXhR17FhjAdT4dcYC1tkYfoTBip2M=; b=roGDp5mnlKEEZ5dzM2NyfTPcfMrs3YZui9gSO0zLXjr7AI8GbSDH+x6Z+pDLypb/YQ ECXEQ0rS+MF5AFK9LbhrosdOPCCPRVxVZ2sgeNdh4i8sZWiY8m9427iZGxhRVfbGVwvF qHn8XrEizLZmKEZ0BIlR3oyH/dsvWMVX2aIjtb8Y4WgknTh/p8vM3v8vNYWswV4vW7EV U7oIUjAareLpPviqriIyRw467vsiXhUnMNPEaWKD44T6/ce6s4xQdc9eGTO9g0pyAr8g sOZLGHpIs2mSu1B8UgPA6qL7NxpDWvZzHx1bsL+yLGJ1q1iSqcLlCvPSxEUChlBRLhbY 1jJg== X-Received: by 10.25.154.5 with SMTP id c5mr6351773lfe.103.1444520586934; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (176-93-46-50.bb.dnainternet.fi. [176.93.46.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t129sm1558119lfd.5.2015.10.10.16.43.05 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 02:43:02 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] adding "rtt" support correctly X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:43:33 -0000 > On 11 Oct, 2015, at 02:08, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > is it up to me to do that, add it to the API, and break it for some = other stuff? > (I'd meant to do that last week, but you all know what I got sucked > into instead) I=E2=80=99ve been meaning to deal with the API for a while myself. It = needs completely rearranging in the stats department, not just slightly = extending it. The configuration side is already extensible, but I should review and = polish that at the same time. > jonathon, I would like you to commit or not commit to delivering the > dual hash idea next week. Otherwise, I think we should submit cake to > net-next for review as it stands after the rtt change enters. I=E2=80=99ll see what I can do here. I keep getting distracted by more = mundane things, so if those stay out of the way for a change... - Jonathan Morton