From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Shefali Gupta <shefaligups11@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:07:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E3A25C01-E737-4689-B757-040AA312832E@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFp5xQ5Wdds2kq_Lnf2LuXkzENFv6HLFSu54oB4ZW+1cOVTRyg@mail.gmail.com>
> On 25 Jan, 2019, at 4:48 pm, Shefali Gupta <shefaligups11@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We have added CoDel and PIE graphs for Heavy and Mix scenarios.
Excellent!
Here we can clearly see the difference that my approach to recovery from the dropping state makes; COBALT maintains much better control of the queue when heavily loaded. The difference is much smaller with the light traffic, because both Codel and COBALT have enough time to recover completely to the quiescent state in that case.
This is definitely worth writing about in a paper. You'll probably want my insight into the precise nature of the difference. For that purpose, I'll plot out the drop logs as frequency charts, which should give some clue as to whether BLUE is in effect as well as Codel.
- Jonathan Morton
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-25 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-22 13:57 Jendaipou Palmei
2018-11-22 15:32 ` Dave Taht
2018-11-23 10:52 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-11-23 16:05 ` Dave Taht
2018-11-23 16:43 ` Dave Taht
2018-11-23 17:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-11-24 2:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-11-25 6:22 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-11-27 14:10 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-11-27 14:36 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-11-30 11:53 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-11-30 11:58 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-12-04 10:31 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-12-04 14:39 ` Dave Taht
2018-12-04 15:02 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-12-04 15:20 ` Dave Taht
2018-12-05 12:23 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-12-05 14:23 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-12-06 17:36 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-12-09 8:37 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-12-09 13:21 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-12-10 12:30 ` Jendaipou Palmei
2018-12-10 15:15 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-12-15 19:06 ` Shefali Gupta
2018-12-15 20:10 ` Dave Taht
2018-12-21 10:37 ` Shefali Gupta
2018-12-21 12:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-01-21 11:35 ` Shefali Gupta
2019-01-21 12:57 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-01-23 16:19 ` Shefali Gupta
2019-01-23 16:23 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-01-23 17:27 ` Shefali Gupta
2019-01-25 8:35 ` Shefali Gupta
2019-01-25 9:16 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-01-25 14:48 ` Shefali Gupta
2019-01-25 15:07 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E3A25C01-E737-4689-B757-040AA312832E@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=shefaligups11@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox