* [Cake] improving cake hashing?
@ 2017-02-09 20:46 Dave Taht
2017-02-09 20:49 ` Jonathan Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2017-02-09 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cake List
My original thought was we could leverage skb->hash just as fq_codel
is now in linux head, but that seems to be exclusive of doing
nat/conntrack...
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/MHEQ2jMw1e3
--
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cake] improving cake hashing?
2017-02-09 20:46 [Cake] improving cake hashing? Dave Taht
@ 2017-02-09 20:49 ` Jonathan Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Morton @ 2017-02-09 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht; +Cc: Cake List
> On 9 Feb, 2017, at 22:46, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My original thought was we could leverage skb->hash just as fq_codel
> is now in linux head, but that seems to be exclusive of doing
> nat/conntrack...
We’d also still need to calculate additional hashes to get the endpoint addresses for the dual and triple modes. Hard to see whether it would often be a win.
- Jonathan Morton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-09 20:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-09 20:46 [Cake] improving cake hashing? Dave Taht
2017-02-09 20:49 ` Jonathan Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox