From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com (mail-lf0-x244.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::244])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD393B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu,  9 Feb 2017 15:49:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id x1so1362365lff.0
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:49:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=xSwh5PQ2Z+kLv1W+6d04qQZfJWGhiQkgb4Qd18oGlNo=;
 b=lP0p6yLHdnbf5sbuSnQk1SVrOnpjnJ50bSTcTxx5RQ8hv8TeF28S6CjNPi1xZ25aHE
 R+tsm5N0XhH/oE3RlwNws+iPJbrw9Jq3Rq9JA6WAVNikcyhcpnuLeRzLKdlw8gECIofu
 PGsN73oJp1AI78ZU00i1DlBwXn3JinxuB80dP6Mt2ZU0+ZPNIiShT9YDr2HDqZaI9dJm
 5PazZJGa1jZV3SgJyJiYccQ6eRzMMiAYjpN5fJlBPrBHKChoO7z09LihM9cmUoiSnncB
 7I6qLvZrCfmMGk/NrZ+QbDW5+imHcFMPQyJ7uWq5gjSXHRZWfFqh9Th/pUo5Dd8RcmWi
 BjEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=xSwh5PQ2Z+kLv1W+6d04qQZfJWGhiQkgb4Qd18oGlNo=;
 b=D86jlsuP3t/jOXiGOq9sma8zep6jjxZmhTFk8OpndrdcXtn9h+yl3kr276oCj7s2RC
 W1rX9ku+23Wdjlj2R4Gn7SK2prn9qH3Q8gFBtWP63zpKA+hSu4FDa0/ngTP2buOUbWj+
 SFEfV0/5eon08MV3ktGNHhWbW5rgq+Xa7LZ6o/Q2mPMlsKCnUv8Lb3VhNLI9U8FuFm0F
 NE7SkilmHjZPAeV8OZyKeVLfxTe4ANLiucqkuUXiYZvGE36N9jbbjT95NSm3b6udEinL
 r9Xb4HVbM6EathEv0N8WlmmtZ3VVfHXvfBFysItb5lHBQaOYZDKJ1eEIYqxHS9hifldp
 M0kw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kUyXRHz3HKf3ugszyhm9CyClA0+FMcM/mFqEE9u3iJxugJdEYiEWYoHOXAB9vW/A==
X-Received: by 10.46.69.7 with SMTP id s7mr1986669lja.44.1486673386231;
 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:49:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.100.16] (37-219-206-78.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi.
 [37.219.206.78])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i186sm3823681lfg.38.2017.02.09.12.49.45
 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7K4pKhmE7oAP+4VPHeg-jbM_iwUKU-zUdq0SFHE0QMEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:49:43 +0200
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E4E6EC3C-65AB-4CA1-A1B2-3AE62BCFD12B@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7K4pKhmE7oAP+4VPHeg-jbM_iwUKU-zUdq0SFHE0QMEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Subject: Re: [Cake] improving cake hashing?
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 20:49:47 -0000


> On 9 Feb, 2017, at 22:46, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> My original thought was we could leverage skb->hash just as fq_codel
> is now in linux head, but that seems to be exclusive of doing
> nat/conntrack...

We=E2=80=99d also still need to calculate additional hashes to get the =
endpoint addresses for the dual and triple modes.  Hard to see whether =
it would often be a win.

 - Jonathan Morton