From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAD921F754 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lfbn126 with SMTP id n126so33794150lfb.2 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:33:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SJIAMKjwV9+xCyecKxmlh5ZIcZuEkzgGKHcBdu8pSVI=; b=tynxXppUCvM5nvwOo23qCM5uxC9+4RMaJpulL9bXsRtFOjbCadlrryNhB0Lmn1Rco4 SwlJNcrxanbt3rKcdLv9APexvWRe5j3/XquYPBFc/zVjLzw5hactTDOML/zLO/F3zmAh sq/tqRKToQ1Oog+lX2fU6aHHo+70E9sSD2mfn3qSJfBtng/RgEr7G6DE1u2fZ/vg4VGE jjchZiP7+8RDx+GyG6nCCjQscs+GfZXhssoHrCinE7tC8oTWK4xr0N2RJhXlFrO2St5s BoWtgsNeGQYwvEm2yicbhJEWgXZFkxjFk19cXlbYVPcsvqlKbuMUaJvXlMu8O0plpJvk 6wuA== X-Received: by 10.25.163.131 with SMTP id m125mr2756634lfe.0.1446215582911; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (83-245-237-115-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.237.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t204sm1295552lfd.41.2015.10.30.07.33.01 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <87r3kcedye.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:33:00 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87r3kcedye.fsf@toke.dk> To: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Felix Fietkau , Jesper Dangaard Brouer Subject: Re: [Cake] kernel performance analysis in openwrt X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:33:28 -0000 > On 30 Oct, 2015, at 14:30, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen = wrote: >=20 > No issues on x86 that I've noticed. The slowdown is on the Archer. That=E2=80=99s ARM based, isn=E2=80=99t it? I have a theory if so. - Jonathan Morton