From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7DC3B2A2 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 01:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id e133so3593184lfe.3 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:36:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OkcaNRRsyunhd/ql6jijbo4lNp4UuCT5VGnzhGRut9s=; b=Y5IVJyLY5LjrEZVyB+Xg4T/cGVT0vsu3TSqvM57ub6Q5hzlLdPzVoZntPsarDzYbEC L0UBeZ2e8z4j4BV2HQVySpQdQH+l/EVW0T6Da3NXuhkuVdkxZ67rWf55IKmmyLvZ+ALT j9R1UTNOPTSglzIv/+GmaeKOK7t+ck4LliQWa3NUcve61kU3W8ekP5QHPfby2YiajVNP 4qBaES+lBxqEA2zy4IUr/LSnnPkJEUKxDMfwFsrvr0tzsm54rUSIcyynVYpNXP91QbJt 0k/zfxqpLwgC63W08Eikw1NvlMfStrfrvs3iklBqFlDf5y+2j3GWLXdNP0n5i+FmA/Jy h0vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OkcaNRRsyunhd/ql6jijbo4lNp4UuCT5VGnzhGRut9s=; b=FddDzD9eWtfwiaFvacyb6NCu5kZckuRHs2HAYV3Na5ii9tMkkpMpuMrB+G2MkOjMRP GtWT3V1OTsyItj5jIaxjU86zk8xn3nRG/EEK0gnWz68Xj+gpZU6Ii50q/jxnMwoUPz1Z P3rrIszCnCEi4KiIlYrA/HhQ840nzThKiQVndQRY8QaSP8NOtVLiDyhKoY7wR/95IcG2 oIWoqCtHPsI3iXvP9RPH8H/QWSOg3ZBapeFXhPAilo4TU2gvMxaEgOPDG622k79+keFH xkWxKxzPw1nECo5ldTdjFTcP9ncbr/93VFoEfH4aScSA7ihKytAAMwO1LabZajDY/u2p t2zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJINib16u+jf31+BbWirgMyNjFjDFLyK2ZboEJWsplAYr630son2vg73xAMp8m74rw== X-Received: by 10.25.160.79 with SMTP id j76mr162617lfe.83.1459229761902; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (37-33-67-252.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.33.67.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xf10sm5111166lbb.23.2016.03.28.22.36.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <20160328140104.3c55079e@xeon-e3> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:35:58 +0300 Cc: Allan Pinto , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <34953EAA-4C76-456E-9B9E-3A73D0DACCDE@gmail.com> <855E3354-30E6-4658-AF38-A0C1E92085CE@gmail.com> <66A00804-E571-4A44-BE3E-422F78C1F1F7@gmail.com> <198CD4FC-6BD4-40DA-BE2F-22BBBA1E204D@gmail.com> <20160328140104.3c55079e@xeon-e3> To: Stephen Hemminger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Subject: Re: [Cake] cake separate qos for lan X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 05:36:03 -0000 > On 29 Mar, 2016, at 00:01, Stephen Hemminger = wrote: >=20 > IMQ was abandoned by original author because there was no way to make = it reliable and SMP safe. That=E2=80=99s a shame, because for this use-case, it=E2=80=99s a heck = of a lot easier to get it doing the right thing - simply because = iptables is that much more flexible than the u32 filter. But maybe u32, in the hashing configuration, scales better. - Jonathan Morton