From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com (mail-wm1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53AF03BA8E for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id e16so4040109wme.1 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heistp.net; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+4yhQ2e2+WQ1ZNMNPl07RbXhHcHuC+L0FYdYZl3bs2E=; b=krZp4CDhr9BDpf3eWu1GxxpL5VEx6EiRuV/Z0LiCQPK+DsWvbq3dTaZIb9I3a1Nwpx YUd+Up5DmwvtdJ459xnqFFe/3HPCGfk5XsRKBjN5+2ZTjETMeenvsslmwM684xeXp0vf bsR8RAeTYcRI4i1CGinYU4z9csGCauresg+/Na1gu6Q2lFUADY8ztPi1mKu+21x0WETQ xY47WDF/EPHBBBO6pRAfa/yIgOglfvqzO22A/CSUtbVc9eXE5vXVejawyuPt/87ikQra U/Kjjjx5FmfLGB5Us1UGkcLK6p2OzDqRpivPlD6+H4MH+O+unNEW+e5N6w23DVtWklxc S7rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+4yhQ2e2+WQ1ZNMNPl07RbXhHcHuC+L0FYdYZl3bs2E=; b=fYxnT5GinsNOcvK8L6/WtVGewXKb+jOzt//lDfVdeCTtvsuORFRLxQEGHMuBodD5AZ CONpjBtz8XE6xErUk+S41NUQAOsZvkEKMOPI+qkRkAFq3XD+OS2OXyf7Y5Umo1qP6J2I eYUXsTNTQ2JKkDQtSAU8lAUk6xWO8dFBvjTGBHhiSvPwtNq+5pwmuZUiUQ3dctDcJxM+ IBJzGwaVX+aXEJCuNWSFEHCHfoL4zwk8n4Lkc59Jb7UF/0BFqTkAMoOy677BH0sIeKvT lM9oCjFbNyXaXPAqu5/NRC+dv5I4vaUKccPuuL6SYaILjj876POnP7N7skHDADB0xLqa 9CMw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9vAnWB3coWPY5Cz3GwTtAA3hvTIv70Cnbi1qtxqQ7qCSRkDxi 09fvffpVyLr/E8yk1Pk9kduPgQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2R7Eo9XwNwD4jRc3d2dV34C1VnjiASdtsDZfCPf6NYYQ5fSAxs7puxqieDprNYwR8vAsdtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b783:: with SMTP id h125mr3600886wmf.119.1552425880357; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tron.luk.heistp.net (h-1169.lbcfree.net. [185.193.85.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm8900915wrw.19.2019.03.12.14.24.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) From: Pete Heist In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:24:37 +0100 Cc: Cake List , cerowrt-devel Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Subject: Re: [Cake] looking for some testers this week X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:24:41 -0000 > On Mar 12, 2019, at 4:19 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > We already made the 240/4 address range work in openwrt in december. > This patch adds in other formerly reserved address ranges: >=20 > 1) = https://github.com/dtaht/unicast-extensions/blob/master/patches/linux/0001= -Allow-0.0.0.0-8-and-reduce-localnet-and-enable-225-2.patch >=20 > And it would be good to know if these addresses worked at all, on > wifi, and through nat. We hit a limit in the netifd daemon last time. >=20 > (this is in relation to my moonshot talk at netdevconf. Which is > totally a moonshot) Yes, this rfc and patch are off the deep end. :) Then again, I haven=E2=80= =99t used the Mbone since =E2=80=9995 on IRIX, so I for one am ok with = killing that dead. Working on building my first OpenWRT image, ever. Does 32-bit mips do = you much good? I guess I=E2=80=99ll just see what I can do with two boxes somewhere on = 224.0.0.0/4... > 2) I hope we have the first SCE ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-taht-tsvwg-sce-00 ) patchset > up fairly soon for fq_codel_fast (my out of tree mildly improved > fq_codel), and sch_cake. Maybe Freebsd also, if anyone here runs that. Looking forward to that patch (esp. Cake). > There's one other thing I'd like to test, if at all possible - that's > the new babel-hmac code. Likely too much for me to digest before the conference.=