From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Modification of DRR with deficit saving
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:01:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F4EFD094-79B4-4C4B-95E7-CB7FFA3755A5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bmi97l3w.fsf@toke.dk>
> On 4 Jan, 2018, at 4:29 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>
> This popped up in my Google Scholar notifications:
>
> https://atlas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/~menth/papers/Menth18b.pdf
>
> Basically, they are proposing to permit a queue to accumulate a larger
> deficit while empty to allow light users to achieve the same throughput
> as heavy users (users being an endpoint with potentially multiple
> flows).
>
> Not sure how useful this really is, but it's somewhat related to Cake's
> src/dst user fairness feature, so may be of interest.
They're trying to solve the same problem as DRR++ does, not the same one as Triple Isolation does.
As a result, they've basically proposed a bugfix to the original DRR (ie. you should keep replenishing the deficit until it saturates, even if the queue is temporarily empty), without gaining the full benefit of DRR++.
Not interesting at all.
- Jonathan Morton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-04 14:29 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-01-04 14:52 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 15:01 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2018-01-04 15:23 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-01-04 15:42 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 15:53 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-01-04 16:20 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 16:24 ` Luca Muscariello
2018-01-04 16:39 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-05 8:19 ` Pete Heist
2018-01-04 15:56 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F4EFD094-79B4-4C4B-95E7-CB7FFA3755A5@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox