Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel?

[Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>]

> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 11:14:14 +0000
> From: <erik.taraldsen@telenor.com>
> To: <moeller0@gmx.de>
> Cc: <me@lochnair.net>, <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel?
> Message-ID: <1493810054966.42941@telenor.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
>> Fra: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
>>       Well, compared to most on this list you have a huge impact on the chipset vendors, so I hope for the best. 
>> Is there anybode besides Broadcom and Intel actually producing VDSL chipsets or is that the set of vendors 
>> that need to be convinced?
> 
> There are other chipset vendors, but they have very little precense in the west.  They typically aim for super low-cost volum in Asia.  Pure bridge units which in extreme cases can't push packets trough at sync speed.  So for all intents and purposes I think the focus for DSL has to be Broadcom and Intel.

If someone takes the time to write a petition, I would sign it as I’m sure would others. Delivered to the right people (the other tricky part), it could mean something. I feel the same way about Cake on the ER-X.