From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake upstream Planning
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:14:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F9CF3DD7-5AED-4EE5-AC47-C31A5AFE1FBE@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1019.1510802012.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:04 PM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> writes:
>>
>> TCP RTT ~= 8ms with default qdisc, throughput ~= 940 Mbit
>> TCP RTT ~= 4.5ms with ‘cake unlimited’, throughput ~= 920 Mbit
>> TCP RTT ~= 1ms with ‘cake unlimited lan’, throughput ~= 920 Mbit
>>
>>
>> This was with BQL in play? Monitoring BQL's behavior might help.
>>
>> I'd also love to know an exact setting for the shaper as a close as
>> possible to the underlying bandwidth of ethernet. However, I tend to be
>> plagued with
>>
>>
>> Yes, with BQL (Intel I210 with igb driver on the APU2). An rrul_be test with —
>> socket-stats.
>
> https://github.com/ffainelli/bqlmon was a tool for looking at bql more
> directly.
>
> I had forked it for some reason or another:
>
> https://github.com/dtaht/bqlmon
Nice, that does work for me. It’s interesting that there are four queues for the igb driver, 00 - 03, and when I try an rrul_be_nflows test, not all four queues are necessarily used. Once I get >= 8 flows in each direction they usually are though. I suppose this is the driver deciding when to start using another queue or not.
Cake does seem to visibly reduce the size of the queues. For whatever terminal/ncurses weirdness reason though, the bar graphs may be sometimes blowing off the top of my 45 row screen, but it doesn’t entirely ruin the experience.
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1019.1510802012.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-16 9:14 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-11-16 16:31 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-16 18:40 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-16 19:13 ` Dave Taht
[not found] <mailman.1013.1510778675.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-16 9:50 ` Pete Heist
[not found] <mailman.7.1510506001.13084.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-14 9:51 ` [Cake] Donation Pete Heist
2017-11-14 20:10 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-15 14:41 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-15 19:44 ` [Cake] Cake upstream Planning Dave Taht
2017-11-15 20:04 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-15 20:44 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-15 20:49 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-15 20:06 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-15 20:19 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-15 20:28 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2017-11-15 20:58 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-15 22:40 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2017-11-16 8:41 ` Pete Heist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F9CF3DD7-5AED-4EE5-AC47-C31A5AFE1FBE@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox