From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cake] diffserv3 tin 2 target 50% of interval?
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FE6323FC-1A04-4FF7-AEE0-9364B9692AAC@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi, I’m finally getting to diffserv testing and am wondering about the tin 2 parameters of the default ‘diffserv3':
Tin 0 Tin 1 Tin 2
thresh 3125Kbit 50Mbit 12500Kbit
target 5.8ms 5.0ms 5.0ms
interval 100.8ms 100.0ms 10.0ms
Pk-delay 0us 0us 0us
Av-delay 0us 0us 0us
Sp-delay 0us 0us 0us
…
My understanding from the latest CoDel RFC: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-aqm-codel-06.txt
and notes in the Overview section of this document from K. Nichols: http://www.pollere.net/Pdfdocs/noteburstymacs.pdf
are that ‘interval' should generally remain at 100ms and that ‘target' should be computed at around 5-10% of interval, and preferably closer to 5%.
In my testing, which I’ll release more results from soon, I’ve seen no significant benefit to changing target or interval from their defaults for either Wi-Fi or 100Mbit wired links. I question that lowering tin 2’s interval to 10ms provides any benefit, and in fact could very well cause undesired behavior for those using the defaults.
I could provide a spread of tests comparing ‘diffserv3' to ‘diffserv4’ for rrul at various bandwidths, but since ‘diffserv4’s tins all have standard 5/100 target and interval parameters, that seems preferable to the default of ‘diffserv3’. Is there a justification for setting the interval outside the guidelines suggested by CoDel’s authors?
Pete
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 10:17 Pete Heist [this message]
2017-02-22 10:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-22 11:12 ` Pete Heist
2017-02-22 11:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-22 11:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-03-19 15:41 ` Pete Heist
2017-02-22 12:44 ` Pete Heist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FE6323FC-1A04-4FF7-AEE0-9364B9692AAC@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox