From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DF121F3E7 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 04:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by lffu14 with SMTP id u14so25260344lff.1 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 04:30:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=y9miIhjKjeO23Y9XuDVn3/qrdpp2FUVK9eOl1KSL0/I=; b=CiYUGTXPMQ1LmwPNiUYpcuG1tqwc3YFRqJ1PFQQG8AT26ojxNXCMML2qksNzaSSR6d sI7KiQg3FyQ4jNeQwrDVGSCCaXpLL7C+JSBkW9BpJWcb4SuIPsCQM9FNFBLPyCZ1DLgi 32BNZV1wvt5YbpRoufeInZNAONfkjuDT2Yi0CVh4QAm/qQClG2wYyYuY0KSa2+frDwwU Kv3ylf9zkZ9SxnGYBf1rWUnD38cPzwwPoE88dpDfIARu34Dpd9vbMt1H0R2Qn8yXqp02 VlXSJpRv+3EwOJtwG0PvFbgtdxYzL5DbX3s4vf2FtrSff6E0ulazjYxO6nhMtvNV7VVB ZboA== X-Received: by 10.25.162.144 with SMTP id l138mr573004lfe.30.1447849841281; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 04:30:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (83-245-246-100-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.246.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id zm10sm385813lbb.49.2015.11.18.04.30.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 04:30:40 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:30:39 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] trying to figure out differences between tbf and cake X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:31:08 -0000 > On 18 Nov, 2015, at 14:25, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > qdisc tbf 1: root refcnt 2 rate 100Mbit burst 1512b lat 100.0ms Looks like a really small burst parameter. This corresponds to the = =E2=80=9Cleaky bucket pool=E2=80=9D in my previous post. - Jonathan Morton